News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Service Tax - No tax payable on services provided to SEZ Unit: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, OCT 07, 2013: THE issue involved in this case is whether service of man-power supply provided by the appellant to M/s. Reliance Petroleum Ltd., Jamnagar, a unit situated in SEZ, was exempted from payment service tax for the period from 03/03/2009 to 20/05/2009, as a result of amendment carried on in the Notification No.15/2009-ST dated 20/05/2009 to Notification No.9/2009-ST dated 03/03/2009. It is the case of Revenue that during the period from 03/03/2009 to 20/05/2009, the appellant was required to discharge service tax liability and follow refund procedure prescribed under Notification No.09/2009-ST.

Aggrieved by the above order of the adjudicating authority, the appellant filed this appeal claiming that by virtue of Sec. 26 (1)(e) of the SEZ Act, 2005 (2005 Act) read with Rule 31 of SEZ Rules, the appellant was always exempt from payment of service tax.

It was argued that during the period from 03/03/2009 to 20/05/2009, exemption was correctly availed. It was further argued by the appellant that demand is hopelessly time barred because supply of duty free service had been specifically mentioned in the ST-3 returns filed by the appellants with the department and exemption from payment of service tax on services imparted to SEZ have been mentioned and the invoices also show the details.

The Tribunal observed,

Under Notification No.15/2009-ST dated 20/05/2009, exemption from payment of service to the service providers was made available by a suitable amendment in proviso (c) of para 1 of Notification No.9/2009-ST dated 03/03/2009 for the services provided inside SEZ. Before this amendment also, exemption was available to the service recipient by way of refund by the service recipient subject to certain conditions. In this regard, appellant has relied upon the judgment of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs. CCE & ST (LTU) Mumbai - (2012-TIOL-1034-CESTAT-MUM) under which it was held that even if a service provider was not required to pay duty as per the amended provisions of Notification No.9/2009-ST but paid for some reasons then the service provider was entitled to refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On the same analogy when services supplied to SEZ are considered as services provided inside a SEZ unit, there is no service tax liability on such deemed export as held by CESTAT in the case of Sujana Metal Products Ltd., vs. CCE, Hyderabad - (2011-TIOL-1173-CESTAT-BANG).

The appellant has further relied upon the judgment of Intas Pharma Ltd. vs. CST, Ahmedabad - 2013-TIOL-1091-CESTAT-AHM holding that in view of the provisions of Sections 7, 26 and 51 of 2005 Act [SEZ Act, 2005], exemption to services provided to a SEZ were always (available and Notification No.9/2009-ST and No.15/2009-ST have only operationalized the exemption provided.

From the provisions contained in Section 26 (1)(e) of the SEZ Act, read with Rule 30 (10) of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it can be seen that no service tax is payable on the services provided by a service provider to a SEZ unit. Further, Sec. 51 of the SEZ Act also makes an over-riding provision that SEZ Act shall have effect even if there is anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any other law. It is accordingly held that Notification No.9/2009-ST and amended Notification No.15/2009-ST have been only issued to operationalize the exemption/immunity available to SEZ unit under Sec. 26(1)(e) of the SEZ Act, 2005. Appeal allowed.

(See 2013-TIOL-1473-CESTAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.