News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
CX - It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on matter, latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on subject: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 28, 2014: THE short question involved is whether the trade discount passed on by the appellant to Oil Marketing Company can be considered as trade discount or not and whether excise duty is leviable on this amount considering the same as part of the value of the goods sold.

The CCE, Mumbai-II confirmed the demand of Rs.1.68 crores for the period April, 2011 to October, 2011 along with interest and, therefore, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that huge demands have been raised by the Revenue in the matter since 2003 and eight appeals on the same issue have been filed before the CESTAT and the Tribunal had ordered pre-deposit of 6% of the duty demanded in all these cases and, therefore, a similar view should be taken in the present appeal also. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Bhagyanagar Gas Ltd. (2013-TIOL-241-CESTAT-BANG) wherein on the same issue the Tribunal had granted stay taking into account the fact that an amount of Rs.2.22 lakhs has been paid by the appellant against the confirmed demand of Rs.20.89 lakhs. It is also submitted that except for the demand for the period April, 2003 to March, 2008, all the other demands were for the normal period of time.

The Revenue representative submitted that in the matter of the last appeal which concerned the period July, 2010 to January, 2011, vide order dated 21.1.2014 the Bench had directed the appellant to make pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed within eight weeks. And, therefore, a similar view ought to be taken in the present application also.

The Bench observed -

“5.1 We find that when the stay petition came up for consideration before this Tribunal on the last occasion on 21.1.2014, this Tribunal after considering the submissions made by both the sides, directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed on the ground that on the earlier decisions, pre-deposit was ordered taking into account the demand for the normal period of time. In the case before us, the entire demand is for the normal period of time. It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on a matter, the latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on the subject. Therefore, following our latest order dated 21.1.2014, we direct the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of excise duty confirmed within a period of eight weeks from today. On deposit of the above amount, pre-deposit of the remaining dues is waived and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal.”

(See 2014-TIOL-462-CESTAT-MUM)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Precedents are like old wine

"It is well settled position that...." etc might impress novices. That's about it. Older a precedent, and longer it stands undisturbed, grater its probative value, subject of course to any changes in the statute laws. One cannot find any judicial authority, or support in texts on jurisprudence that latest decisions have to be preferred over older judgments. Precedents have to be applied based on the established principles of law governing the doctrine of precedents, not based on how latest they are. "Latest" might be the politically correct approach in many fields of life, but not necessarily in the administration of justice.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.