News Update

GST - Penalty demand of Rs.3731 crores - A person who would fall within the purview of sub-section (1-A) of s.122 should necessarily be a taxable person who retains the benefits of transactions: HCGST - Threatening and pressurising petitioner who is merely an employee - Highly unconscionable and disproportionate on the part of the officer: HCGST - Same relief was claimed in earlier petition which was withdrawn unconditionally - Fresh petition seeking same relief is barred by the estoppel principle: HCIncome tax hands over Rs 1700 Cr tax demand to Congress PartyGST - Neither SCN nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, hence cannot be sustained: HCStage-2 of Vikram-1 orbital rocket successfully test-firedGST - Non-application of mind - If reply was unsatisfactory, details could have been sought - Record does not reflect that such exercise was done - Matter remitted: HCHouthis claim UK has not capability to intercept their hypersonic missilesGST - Merely because a taxpayer has not filed returns for some period does not mean that registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HCIsraeli forces kill 200 Palestinians at Gaza medical complex & arrest over 1000GST - Petitioner's reply, although terse, is not taken into account while passing assessment orders - Petitioner put on terms, another opportunity provided: HCUnveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTAT
 
Income tax - Whether if assessee-club sells complimentary liquor for a price, such activity is to be construed as commercial in nature - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 31, 2015: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether the value of complimentary liquors has to be assessed as income of the assessee, if the assessee has failed to furnish the details of persons who consumed the complimentary liquor and such liquor has been sold at a price. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is a mutual association. During assessment, the AO observed that the assessee had claimed certain receipts as exempt from taxation under mutuality principles. The AO noticed that some companies had contributed to certain events organized by the assessee and since the contributors were non-members, the AO took the view that the above said contributions were assessable as the income of the assessee. The AO further noted that the value of complimentary liquors was to be assessed as income of the assessee, since the assessee had failed to furnish the details of persons who consumed the complimentary liquor and accordingly assessed the sale value of complimentary liquor as income of the assessee. On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the same. Before the Tribunal, the counsel of the assessee had contended that in respect of sponsorship receipts, companies had only contributed to the conducting of events by way of sponsorship and which were used to reduce the cost of expenditure incurred in respect of those events. Accordingly he submitted that there was no income element involved in these receipts. Also, if the above said receipts were considered to the income then the corresponding expenditure should be allowed as deduction. However, in respect of complimentary liquor the counsel of submitted that the assessee had sold the complimentary liquors only to its members and that non-members were not allowed to utilize the services of the club.

On appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ there is no dispute that the companies are non-members. However, we are of the view that one has to see the object behind the receipt of these contributions from the above said companies. There is no dispute that the assessee has been organizing various events for the mutual benefit of its members. The contributions, if any, received from the members were utilized for conducting the events and the surplus, if any, is accepted as exempt under the principles of mutuality. The above said companies have partly sponsored the events, apparently as a part of their respective sales promotion activities. Hence, the objective of the assessee in receiving these contributions, in our view, can only be considered to be to meet part of the expenditure incurred in organizing the events. Hence, in our view, there is no intention to earn any income out of the above said contributions, since it only goes to reduce the expenditure. Hence, we are of the view the above said contribution cannot be subjected to tax as income in the hands of the assessee. Accordingly, we set aside the order of Ld CIT(A) on this issue and direct the AO to delete this addition;

++ we find merit in the view taken by tax authorities. It is an accepted fact that the complimentary liquor has been sold at a price, meaning thereby the intention of the assessee was to make profit out of sale of complimentary liquors. Thus, the action of the assessee was commercial in nature. It was not shown to that the liquor companies, who have given complimentary liquors, are members of the assessee. Hence, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the CIT(A) on this issues;

++ in the appeal filed by the revenue, the only issue urged relates to the assessment of interest income of Rs.7,08,931/-. Both the parties agreed that this issue has since been decided against the assessee by Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club. Accordingly, we set aside the order of CIT(A) on this issue and confirm the assessment of interest income.

(See 2015-TIOL-331-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023