News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Mandatory pre-deposit of fixed percentage of duty & penalty - Amended provisions of Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 do not apply for appeals filed and pending as on date of amendment: High Court

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, JUNE 16, 2015: RECENTLY, we carried an order by the Mumbai Tribunal [2015-TIOL-1093-CESTAT-MUM] holding that the amended provisions of pre-deposit would apply to all the appeals filed on or after the amendment, though the dispute pertains to the period prior to the amendment of the provisions. But what about the cases pending before the Tribunal as on the date of amendment?

In this case, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs 25 lakhs against a demand of Rs 2.49 crores. The assessee contested that as per the amended provisions of Section 35F, the amount of pre-deposit is only 7.5% of the duty demand.

The Appellant relied on the judgment of Rajasthan High Court in the Case of Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India and Others, Appeal No. 1 of 2015 decided on 12.2.2015 wherein a Division Bench has opined that in view of the amended Section 35F, the benefit of deposit of 7.5% only must be extended to the appellant in appeal which had been filed prior to the enforcement of the amended Section 35F i.e. 6th August, 2014. Any other direction will be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

However, the High Court did not agree with the preposition as laid down in the said judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited.

The High Court held that from a simple reading of Section 35F, which is not under challenge, it cannot be disputed that the provision of Section 35F as amended vide Finance Act 2 of 2014 w.e.f 6th August, 2014 will have no application on the appeals which were filed and were pending before the Tribunal prior to the said date.

It is settled law that if the language of the statute is simple and admits of only one meaning than no rule of interpretation is to be applied and the simple meaning has to be given effect to.

Accordingly, the High Court declined to interfere with the order of pre-deposit by the Tribunal.

In passing:  Also see Arjun Industries 2015-TIOL-1364-HC-RAJ-CUS.

(See 2015-TIOL-1449-HC-ALL-CX)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.