News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Cus - Seized foreign origin gas cylinders were loaded in truck & appellants as well as driver of truck had not been able to identify either consignor or consignee - appellants' involvement could not be denied - Penalty correctly imposed: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JAN 24, 2016: THE appellants are engaged in the business of the Transport and Logistics services all over India by hiring trucks of other owners when required for transporting their customers' goods. They had hired one such truck for transportation of goods. On 21.06.2007, at Naubatpur Trade Tax Check Post, the said truck was checked by the Sales Tax Authorities. The truck was loaded with foreign origin gas cylinders [Refrigerant 22, valued at Rs.4,00,000/-] without papers in the garb of machinery and auto parts and, therefore, the Trade Tax Officials seized the goods. The Indian goods loaded in the truck were released by the officers of Trade Tax Department. The alleged contraband goods and the truck was taken by the Customs Officers to Varanasi Customs Office where the witnesses were called, pursuant to which a show cause notice dated 26.12.2007 was issued to the appellants.

The appellants denied any knowledge of the contraband nature of the goods. In adjudication, the Commissioner of Customs imposed a personal penalty of Rs.2,50,000/- on the appellant, who hired the truck and Rs.10,000/- on the driver. The truck was also confiscated and an option was given for release of the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs.1,00,000/-.

As the Tribunal had upheld the order, the appellant is before the High Court and inter alia submits that the Tribunal had decided the appeal in casual manner without considering the submissions made and, therefore, the matter needs to be remanded.

The counsel for the Revenue supported the order.

The High Court held -

++ Fact is not disputed that the seized foreign origin gas cylinders were loaded in the truck hired by the appellants and the appellants as well as the driver of the truck had not been able to identify either consignor or consignee of the seized goods. Therefore, the appellants' involvement in loading foreign origin gas cylinders in the truck in question could not be denied.

++ Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that any prohibited goods found concealed in any manner in any conveyance shall be liable to confiscation. Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 provides that any persons, who acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing, or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under Section 111 shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding the value of the goods or five thousand rupees, whichever is the greater.

++ In this case, the seized goods was valued worth Rs.4,00,000/-. Therefore, the appellate authority imposed the penalty. The penalty imposed upon the appellants is less than the value of the goods, which has been upheld by the learned Tribunal.

Concluding that the Tribunal had rightly rejected the appellants' appeal, the instant appeals were dismissed.

(See 2016-TIOL-135-HC-ALL-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.