News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Competition Act - Whether exclusive arrangement between Govt and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under LTC scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices - NO: CCI

BY TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 04, 2016: THE issue is: Whether the exclusive arrangement between Government of India and Air India with respect to all air travelling purposes under the Leave Travel Concession scheme amounts to anti-competitive practices. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The informant is an Individual. He was a consultant with different ministries to the Government of India. He filed complaint against Air India (OP 1), the Union of India and other airlines u/s 19(1)(a) of Act. The allegation was that Indian Government, through its policy directives/ office orders, force Government servants to avail the air travel services offered by Air India at a price which was much higher than those offered by its competitors in the market. The Government through its policy initiatives, ensure that OP 1 enjoys the benefits of having a captive customer base comprising of the government employees together with their dependants who undertake air travel under Leave Travel Concession ('LTC') Scheme, the government employees on official tour, and the private individuals traveling on government invitation. According to the Informant, support of the Union of India in the aforesaid manner had placed OP 1 in a dominant position, who engage itself in an unfair and discriminatory practice by charging a higher price for the tickets booked under LTC Scheme. The Informant further alleged that despite being conscious of the above said anti-competitive practices, other airlines remained silent because of the fear of a regulatory backlash from Union of India. It was alleged that compelling the government employees to avail the air travel services provided by OP 1 had been violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India.

Reasoning

Similar allegations had been examined by the Commission in the case of Travel Agents Association of India v. Balmer Lawries & Co. Ltd. & Anr., wherein the Commission held that the Government of India was the consumer of air ticketing services and a consumer is free to make a choice as far as selection of goods or services are concerned. Moreover, Ministries of Government of India are not an enterprise under the provisions of section 2(h) of the Act. Going by the same logic, the Commission in the present case held that Government of India is the consumer of air travel services as the tickets purchased under the LTC Scheme are funded by it. As a consumer of air travel services, it enjoys the liberty to exercise its choice even if such exercise of choice causes a favourable treatment for some Airline over the others.

Editor's Note: The reasoning of the Commission appears to be not very convincing and moreover with this order, there is one more addition after the IRCTC order to the list of orders when the Commission has ruled in favour of the Govt. The present practice of exclusive arrangement between Air India and the Govt of India under the Leave Travel Concession scheme certainly gives no option whatsoever to the Govt employees to choose any other airlines for their travel purposes.

(See 2016-TIOL-04-CCI-CACT)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.