News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - Whether if trustees of Trust are treated as representative assessee, such trustees are liable to be taxed in respect of income received by Trust at rate contained in Sec 164(1) - YES: HC

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 08, 2016: THE issue is - Whether if the trustees of a trust are treated as a representative assessee by Section 160(1), in that case such trustees are liable to be taxed in respect of income received by trust at the rate specified in Section 164(1). YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee Trust was governed by the provisions of the Trust Deed. It had been assessed as a specific Trust. This was so as the shares of the beneficiaries were determinate and tax was levied in the hands of the beneficiaries for AYs 1978-79 and 1979-80. The aforesaid Trust Deed was modified by the Rectification Deed dated 21st October, 1979. By this Rectification Deed, the power given to the Trustees in the Trust Deed dated 2nd August, 1976 to the effect that in its absolute discretion, the trustees by Resolution, can decide the shares of the beneficiaries in the Trust, was withdrawn. On the basis of the Rectification Deed, it was contended by the Revenue and so held by the Tribunal that on the date of execution of the Trust Deed, it was not a specific trust but a discretionary trust for the reason that the discretion/powers of the trustees was withdrawn only by Deed of Rectification. Therefore, Section 164 would be applicable and in particular, reliance was placed upon Explanation 1(ii) of Section 164  which provides that in case the individual shares of the beneficiaries is not expressly stated in the instrument on the date of execution of the deed of trust, then it would be considered to be a discretionary Trust. In such a case, the tax is to be paid by the Trustees of the Trust.

Held that,

++ the Assessment Order determined the total income at Rs.1.54 lakhs, while categorically holding that no demand is payable by the Trust as the income of the Trust is divided amongst the beneficiaries as per the Trust Deed. Consequently, the tax was recoverable from the beneficiaries of the Trust. Therefore, the option as provided under Section 166 of the Act was exercised by the Revenue. This option as held by the Apex Court is available even in case of discretionary Trusts. Therefore, even in case the Revenue's contention is upheld on merits, it would not yet exclude the application of option in Section 166 which in this case has already been exercised. Therefore, the substantial question of law as raised for our opinion is being returned un-answered as it has now became academic in view of the decision of the Apex Court rendered in Jyotendrasinhji. The above decision was rendered after the making of the statement of case along with the question of law framed by the Tribunal for our opinion. Accordingly, Reference disposed of in the above terms.

(See 2016-TIOL-1661-HC-MUM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.