News Update

Air India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and Japan10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashGST - s.107(11) - There is no fetter on the powers of the appellate authority to modify the order passed u/s 130(2) by the adjudicating authority: HCSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad caseCBDT amends jurisdiction of Pr CCITs in many citiesGST - Statutory mandate of sub-section (4) of Section 75 is that a personal hearing should be provided either, if requested for, or if an order adverse to the taxpayer is proposed to be issued: HCCCI invites proposal for launching Market Study on AI and CompetitionGST - Documents with regard to service of notice could not be located; that impugned orders came be to be passed without an opportunity being granted to Petitioner to submit documents and being heard - Matter remanded: HCIndia initiates anti-dumping duty probe against import of Telescopic Channel drawer slider from ChinaAFMS, Delhi IIT ink MoU for collaborative research & trainingCX - The activity of waste water treatment is part of manufacturing activity and any activity which is directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture would be eligible for credit: CESTATDoP&T notifies fixation of Himachal IPS cadre strength and amendment in pay rulesIndia, Cambodia ink MoU for HRD in Civil ServiceBengaluru Airport Customs seizes 10 yellow anacondas from check-in baggageST - Appellant has collected some service tax from service recipient, which has been deposited with Department, same shall not be refunded to appellant: CESTATDelhi daily air traffic goes beyond 4.7 lakh paxGovt organizing National Colloquium on Grassroots Governance2 Telangana students killed in road accident in USI-T- Addl. Commr. or above ranking officer to probe how I-T portal reflected demand being raised against assessee, despite Revenue not having issued any notice or passed any order against assessee: HCAnother tremor of 6.3 magnitude visits Taiwan; shakes tall buildingsI-T- Donations given out of accumulated funds u/s 11(2) are not allowable as application of income for charitable or religious purposes and the same shall be deemed to be income of assessee : ITATYou are arrogant Mr Musk, says Australian PM over Sydney stabbing video banUnited Health reports theft of huge Americans’ dataI-T - Travelling conveyance expenses should be disallowed to extent of bills which were not verifiable and have no nexus with business of assessee: ITATEarth Day: Biden announces USD 7 bn grant for rooftop solar panelsOECD to release annual report on Tax Inspectors without Borders on April 29EU introduces easy Schengen Visa rules for IndiansI-T- Leasehold rights in land are not within purview of section 50C of Act : ITAT
 
Cus - Notfn. 12/2012-Cus has been issued in public interest- Therefore, it is not correct on part of Revenue to state that since purpose of import of aircraft is in nature of personal use and not for public use the benefit should be denied: AAR

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 30, 2016: APPLICANT is a public limited company proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) service - they intend to charter the aircraft imported to related companies, primarily for use by the related company's top executives, directors, investors, promoters and their family members/friends, as revenue flights.

They seek ruling from the Authority on -

Whether the benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non-Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights proposed to be undertaken -

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes.

Revenue submits -that the intended purpose of this aircraft is in the nature of personal use and not for public use; that the aircraft is intended to be used for the personal use of their employees/directors/investors and their family/friends, not necessarily for business purposes - exemption notification (Sr. No. 453 of Notification No. 12/2012-Cus) does not cover these situations to be eligible to claim the benefit of the said notification - As the public interest is always a guiding factor in exemption and as the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification, the application made for advance ruling may be rejected.

Ruling by Advance Rulings Authority:

+ Both the conditions in condition 77 annexed to Notification 12/2012-Cus[Sr. No. 453] make it clear that approval of competent authority is required for import of aircraft for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services and importer is required to furnish undertaking to the Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Customs at the time of import to the effect that the aircraft shall be used only for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services, as the case may be.

+ Both these conditions have to be read in conjunction with Explanation 2 to the notification, which clarifies that the use of such imported aircraft by a non-scheduled (passenger) operator for non-scheduled (charter) services or by a non-scheduled (charter) operator for non-scheduled (passenger) services, shall not be construed to be a violation of the conditions of import at concessional rate of duty. It is noticed from the application filed by the applicant that the applicant is proposing to import aircraft for providing non-scheduled (charter) services; therefore, applicant may use the aircraft imported for providing non-scheduled (passenger) services or non-scheduled (charter) services.

+ Paragraph 2.5 of CAR issued in pursuance of Rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 is regarding operation and use of aircraft and same is part of Explanation I (c) to Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. Therefore, the contention of Revenue that provisions of CAR 2.5 and 2.6 cannot be invoked to avail concessions/facility/ provisions, are not correct. It also noticed that the subject notification as well as contents of CAR does not debar the use of said aircraft for other than business purposes. In the absence of any such restriction, aircraft can be used for other than business purposes.

+ Notification No. 12/2012-Cus has been issued by the Central Govt. in public interest. As discussed, benefit of exemption notification has been extended to operators subject to fulfillment of conditions mentioned therein. Therefore, it is not correct on the part of the Revenue to state that the applicant does not fall within the scope of the notification.

Ruling on the application:

The benefit of the Notification No. 12/2012-Cus is available to NSOP (Non Schedule Operator's Permit) holder for the following categories of revenue flights (with published tariff) proposed to be undertaken;

a) Use by the permit holder's employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

b) Charter the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes

c) Lease the aircraft to group companies for use by their employees/directors and their family, not necessarily for business purposes.

The application was allowed.

(See 2016-TIOL-23-ARA-CUS)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.