News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading the GST Path - VI - Impact on Construction sector

SEPTEMBER 12, 2016

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

1.0 THE Construction sector's tryst with Service Tax is an epic by itself. Same is the case with the sector's engagement with Sales Tax / VAT. So, the sector is looking upon GST as a messiah. Will GST prove to be one?

2.0 The problems of the construction sector is due to the dual taxing powers simultaneously operating on them, each pitted against the other. To elaborate, after the 42 nd Constitutional amendment, whereby transfer of property in goods during execution of a works contract is deemed as a sale, the State Governments have got the authority to tax such deemed sale. Though the service component of the works contract is in the Centre's taxation domain from the beginning, the Centre sought to harness it only from 2004, by way of levying service tax. The roller coaster ride from then on, came to an end with the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE Vs L & T Ltd - 2015-TIOL-187-SC-ST.

3.0 The following are the major problems of the construction sector with regard to taxation.

- Often there is a overreach by one Government into other's domain, especially in terms of valuing their respective taxing events. The value assessed for the State levy is not accepted by the Centre for exclusion and vice versa.

- The composition schemes under the State levy come with lot of impractical conditions.

- The Central duties paid on inputs become a cost.

- The values fixed by each enactment are not realistic and very often one end up paying taxes on a value more than 100, though the total value of the contract is only 100.

4.0 The basic feature of GST is that it seeks to bid adieu to the concept of division of taxation powers between the Centre and States, so that the instances of one Government encroaching upon the domain of other could be avoided. Both Governments will have concurrent taxing jurisdiction on supplies of goods and services. Hence, the need to identify whether the transaction is one of sale or of service, the much talked about aspects theory, the Dominant nature test, Pith and substance, etc. would all be consigned to legal history. This would mean a lot for the construction sector in terms of avoiding disputes.

5.0 Assuming that the rates of CGST and SGST would be equal, there would be no allegations of offloading the values from highly taxed domain to less taxed domain.

6.0 At present, the Central duties (Excise duty, etc.) paid on inputs used for construction is not allowed as cenvat credit for the Works Contractor, inasmuch as there is no Central levy on transfer of property in such goods. Only the State levies (VAT, etc.) can be allowed as Input tax credit. This leads to cost escalation.

6.1 Under the GST regime, as per Schedule II to the model Act, "works contracts" including the incidental transfer of property in goods therein is treated as a supply of service. Such supply of service would be liable to both CGST / SGST - if it is an intra State Supply, and IGST - if it is an inter State supply. Thus the CGST / SGST / IGST paid on various inputs and input services used for the supply of works contract service should be allowed as Input Tax Credit without any restriction. If at all, only the present restriction of not allowing any cenvat credit / input tax credit pertaining to the duties and taxes paid on construction related activities, to the end users, may continue under GST regime, if the present policy in this regard is sought to be continued. Hence, there is every reason to believe that all the GST paid on inward supplies of goods and services would be entitled for Input Tax Credit for a Works Contract Service Provider.

Before parting:

The various restrictions on availing cenvat credit, contained in Section 16 (9) of the model Act is rather confusingly worded, which eludes clarity and this aspect has already been highlighted in the first article under this series - Treading the GST Path - I - A "Principal" mismatch.

Also See : Treading the GST Path- V - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-IV - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-III - Certain snippets on ITC

Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed

Treading the GST Path-I - A 'Principal' mismatch?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.