News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading the GST Path – VIII – Is Central Excise Duty really gone?

SEPTEMBER 18, 2016


By G. Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

1.0 THE Constitution (One hundred and first) Amendment Act, 2016 seeks to amend various provisions in the Constitution of India, to pave way of imposition of GST. The said Act contains 20 sections, which amends various provisions of the Constitution. As per section 12 of the Act, Article 279 A has been inserted in the Constitution whereby a GST council shall be formed by the President of India within 60 days of the commencement of the said Act. As per Section 1 (2) of the Act, the various provisions of this Amendment Act will come into force from a date to be notified by the Government and various dates can be notified for various provisions to take effect.

1.1 Exercising the powers conferred under Section 1 (2) ibid, the provisions of Section 12 of the Amendment Act, which inserted Article 279A has been notified with effect from 12.09.2016 vide notification dated 10.09.2016. Consequently, the President of India has also constituted the GST council vide Notification dated 15.09.2016.
2.0 Now, all other sections of the Constitution (One hundred and first) Amendment Act, 2016 have been notified to take effect from 16.09.2016, vide Notification dated 16.09.2016. The consequences are mindboggling.

2.1 As we are aware the legislative powers of the Union Government and the State Governments, including the taxation powers, emanate from List I (Unit List), List II (State List) and List III (Concurrent List) of the seventh schedule to the Constitution. Entry 84 of the List I, deals with the power of the Union Government to levy excise duties on goods manufactured or produced in India. Central Excise duties are being levied by the Union Government under this entry. Entry 54 of the List II deals with the power of the State Governments’ to levy taxes on the sale and purchase of goods (VAT). Service tax is being levied under the residuary power of the Union Government under Entry 97 of the List I.

2.2 These entries have been amended by Section 17 of the Constitution (One hundred and first) Amendment Act, 2016, whereby Entry 84 of List I has been amended and Excise duties can be levied by the Union Government only on petroleum products specified therein. Entry 54 of List II has also been amended whereby sales tax could be levied by the State Governments only on sale of petroleum products and alcoholic liquor for human consumption (except inter state sale).

2.3 With the notification of the amendments with effect from 16.09.2016, the amended provisions of the Constitution has come into effect from 16.09.2016. Does it mean that there cannot be any levy of Excise duties by Union Government on all goods other than petroleum products and there cannot be any levy of VAT on intra state sale of goods from 16.09.2016? What about service tax? What will happen since no CGST / IGST Acts have yet been introduced and passed in the Parliament yet and no SGST Act has yet been passed by the State Governments? Will the Government’s coffer would dry up? Has the notification been done in a hurry without analysing its ramifications? Is it the first major goof up under GST?

3.0 Section 19 of the Constitution (One hundred and first) Amendment Act, 2016 provides that any law which was in force in a State prior to commencement of the Constitution (One hundred and first) Amendment Act, 2016 dealing with levy of taxes on goods and services would continue to have effect for a period of one year or till such Acts are repealed by the State legislature. So notwithstanding the amendment to Entry 54 of List I, the State VAT Acts would continue to have validity, till they are replaced by SGST Acts or one year, whichever is less.

3.1 Service tax is already being levied only under Entry 97 of List I and this entry has not been removed, there would not be any problem with regard to collection of service tax post 16.09.2016.

3.2 Union Excise duties on all goods, except petroleum products can be justified only under the residuary power of the Union Government under Entry 97 of List I. The said entry reads as “Any other matter not enumerated in List II or List III including any tax not mentioned in either of those Lists”. Prior to 16.09.2016, Entry 84 specifically empowered the Union Government to levy excise duties on all goods manufactured or produced (except alcoholic liquor for human consumption). When this power is now specifically restricted to cover only excise duties on petroleum goods, can the levy of excise duty on all other goods be justified under the residual entry 97? Had the residual entry 97 itself taken care of all taxing powers of the Union Government, there was no need at all for Entry 84 either. Can the substantial inflow of funds to the Consolidated fund of India, through major indirect taxes be dependent upon the residuary taxing powers of the Union Government? If this residuary power can be used to justify even such major levies, the fear of more such levies being levied in future, after implementation of GST, under the garb of Entry 97 is not ruled out, thereby undermining the avowed objectives of GST.

4.0 It is not clear whether these consequences were thought of and it was a conscious call to notify all sections of the Amendment Act with effect from 16.09.2016 or it was a major goof up, though the same can somehow be justified, based on Section 19 of the Amendment Act and Entry 97 of List I.

Also See : Treading the GST Path - VII - Place of supply of Services

Treading the GST Path - VI - Impact on Construction sector

Treading the GST Path- V - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-IV - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-III - Certain snippets on ITC

Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed

Treading the GST Path-I - A 'Principal' mismatch?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.