News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST Path - XVI - Supply & Consideration

DECEMBER 09,2016

By G Natarajan, Adv., Swamy Associates

1.0 HAPPY to note that many of the issues highlighted in this series of articles have been addressed by the Government in the revised model GST law released in public domain last week. Massive changes have been made in the revised model law. In this article the relevance of "consideration" for determining "supply" may be seen.

2.0 As per Sec 3 of the model Act, supply includes all forms of supply of goods and / or services agreed to be made for a consideration in the course or furtherance of business. Importation of services for a consideration whether or not in the course or furtherance of business is also included in the definition of supply. It may be noted that except those transactions which are mentioned in Schedule I, which would become supply even if made without consideration, in all other cases, "consideration" is a must to constitute supply. Schedule I covers the following.

1. Permanent transfer/disposal of business assets where input tax credit has been availed on such assets.

It may be noted that this provision would apply only if input tax credit has been availed on such assets.

2. Supply of goods or services between related persons, or between distinct persons as specified in section 10, when made in the course or furtherance of business.

A same entity, if registered or required to be registered in more than one State such units requiring such registration would be treated as a distinct person under Section 10. For example, a factory in the State of Karnataka and its depot in the State of Maharashtra require separate registration at both places and supply of goods and / or services between them (eg. Stock transfers) even without consideration would attract GST. But stock transfers within the same State between a factory and depot situated in the same State would not constitute supply and hence would not attract GST, as such supplies without consideration, between the same taxable person are not covered under Schedule I. If the same entity is having another business vertical in the same State and such business vertical has opted for separate registration, supply of goods and services to / from such business vertical would also attract GST.

3. Supply of goods - (a) by a principal to his agent where the agent undertakes to supply such goods on behalf of the principal, or (b) by an agent to his principal where the agent undertakes to receive such goods on behalf of the principal.

Supplies of goods between principals and agents, even without consideration would constitute supply and attract GST. Hence, clearance of goods to a consignment agent / clearing and forwarding agent, even if such agents are located in the same State would attract GST.

4. Importation of services by a taxable person from a related person or from any of his other establishments outside India, in the course or furtherance of business.

3.0 Apart from the above, no other supplies without consideration would be considered as "supply" so as to attract GST.

4.0 As a consequence, if any free sample or gift is given by one person to another or if a service is provided without consideration, such transactions would not attract GST.

4.1 It may also be noted that as per Section 16 (4) (g) no input tax credit would be available in respect of the goods disposed of by way of gift or free samples. For example if any goods are purchased for the purpose of distributing as gifts / free samples, no input tax credit can be availed for the GST paid on such goods. What will happen if the final products manufactured are given as gifts / free samples? Whether input tax credit in respect of the inputs and input services used in the manufacture of final products, which are distributed as gifts / free samples would be entitled? In as much as section 16 (4) (g) reads as, "input tax credit shall not be available in respect of the goods disposed of by gift / free sample" it appears that if the final products are distributed as gift / free sample, proportionate input tax credit in respect of the inputs and input services consumed in their manufacture would not be entitled.

5.0 As per the provisions of the current Cenvat Credit Rules, the definition of "inputs" covers, "goods used for providing free warranty for final products". Hence, cenvat credit availed inputs, can be used for free replacement purposes during the warranty period, without reversal of any credit. Will this position undergo a change under the model GST law?

5.1 It may be noted that the restriction of credit as per Section 16 (4) (g) would apply only if the goods are disposed of as gift/free sample. Free replacement of parts during warranty period could neither be considered as a "gift" nor as a "free sample". Hence, it is felt that input tax credit would continue to be admissible in respect of the inputs used as free replacement during warranty.

6.0 One of the contentious issue under the excise law was the valuation of physician's samples. If the manufacturer himself distributes some of the medicaments manufactured by him as physician sample, it will not attract GST as it is a supply without consideration. But the manufacturer has to forego proportionate input tax credit. When a contract manufacturing unit, manufacturers physician samples and sell the same to the brand owner, the same would attract the levy of GST.

7.0 In case of promotional activities like "Buy one Get one free", GST would be payable only on the item which is being sold and no GST is payable for the goods being given free. But proportionate input tax credit has to be foregone. In the case of multi-piece packages also, where certain goods are given free of cost along with other goods, the same would be the position.

Also See:

Treading GST Path - XV - Intermediaries

Treading GST Path - XIV - A train odyssey

Treading GST Path-XIII - Tyrant time limit

Treading GST Path - XII - All about job work

Treading GST Path – XI -A criss cross study

Treading GST Path - X - Registration - Some practical issues

Treading GST Path - IX - Impact on Transportation & Logistics industry

Treading GST Path – VIII – Is Central Excise Duty really gone?

Treading GST Path - VII - Place of supply of Services

Treading GST Path - VI - Impact on Construction sector

Treading GST Path - V - Transitional Credit

Treading GST Path-IV - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading GST Path-III - Certain snippets on ITC

Treading GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed

Treading GST Path-I - A 'Principal' mismatch?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.