News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - Whether additions can be made on account of investment merely on basis of statement of original owners, in absence of evidences to show transfer of sale consideration - NO: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHEMDABAD, JAN 27, 2017: THE ISSUE IS - Whether an addition can be made on account of investment in property, merely on basis of statement of the original owners, when there is no evidence to show transfer of any sale consideration. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee filed return of income for A.Y. 2008- 09 declaring total income at Rs.46,02,780/-. Assessment order u/s 143(3) was passed determining total income at Rs.2,00,31,830/- making after additions on account of Investment in purchase of land at Adalaj, Disallowance of interest and Disallowance u/s.14A. On appeal, CIT(A) deleted addition made by the A.O. on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/- and confirmed the disallowance of interest of Rs.48,74,798/- out of total interest disallowance of interest of Rs.73,05,794/- and deleted the balance interest expenses of Rs.24,30,996/-. On further appeal, Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and directed AO to delete addition of Rs.48,74,798/- made on account of disallowance of interest expenses. Tribunal dismissed the appeal preferred by the revenue against the order passed by CIT(A) deleting addition made by AO on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ so far as both the assessees are concerned, they have never purchased the land situated at Adalaj from the original land owners i.e., Mr. Gandaji Thakore and others. As per their case and even sale deed produced on record, both the assessee purchased the land from one Mr.Hemendra Shah vide registered sale deed. It has come on record that said Mr.Hemendra Ahsh purchased the land situated at Adalaj from power of attorney holder of the original land owners – Mr.Gandaji Thakore and others and thereafter said Mr.Hemendra Shah sold the said land to the assessee. There is no iota of evidence on record to suggest that the assessee paid Rs.2.10 Crores to said Mr.Hemendra Shah. Solely on the basis of statements of the original land owners – Mr.Gandaji Thakore and others that they received sale consideration from Mr.Champavat, in whose favour sale deed was executed by them in the year 2008, as rightly held by CIT(A) and tribunal, A.O. was not justified in making addition on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/-. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by tribunal in deleting addition made by the A.O. on account of investment in purchase of land at Adalaj of Rs.74,50,000/-.

(See 2017-TIOL-179-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.