News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Import of goods on FOB basis vs CIF basis: Service tax on ocean freight

FEBRUARY 27, 2017

By Rajat Dosi

IN the positive regime of taxation of services w.e.f. 01.07.2012, ocean freight and air freight payable on import of goods into India was kept out of the service tax net by placing them in the negative list. The relevant entry in the negative list has been reproduced below (Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994):

"(p) services by way of transportation of goods –

(iii) by an aircraft or a vessel from a place outside India to the customs station of clearance in India "

In the last year's budget (presented in February, 2016), the above entry was deleted w.e.f. 01.06.2016 and the following exemption was added to the mega exemption notification no. 12/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012, vide Notification No. 09/2016-ST w.e.f. 01.06.2016:

"(53) services by way of transportation of goods by an aircraft from a place outside India upto the customs station of clearance in India."

Therefore, from 01.07.2016 onwards, air freight was completely exempt, however ocean freight was subjected to payment of service tax. In respect of service tax payable on ocean freight, the Government prescribed an abatement of 70%vide carrying out amendments in Notification No. 26/2012-ST dated 10.06.2012.

The position which thus emerges in respect of levy of service tax on ocean freight has been detailed below, for different-different situations:

A. When goods are supplied on FOB basis:

a. The Indian importer undertakes to bear the ocean freight by entering into a contract with an Indian freight forwarder – The Indian freight forwarder will be subject to payment of service tax on the freight amount, under the forward charge mechanism. The Indian importer will be in a position to take CENVAT credit of this service tax paid on ocean freight 1(Assuming the import relates to importation of inputs or capital goods);

b. The Indian importer undertakes to bear the ocean freight by entering into a contract with a Foreign freight forwarder (one who is located in a non-taxable territory) – In terms of Rule 10 of the Place of Provision Rules, 2012 (POP) the place of provision will be India, being the place of destination of imported goods. Since in this situation, the service provider is located outside India, the Indian importer will be liable for payment of service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. The Indian importer will be in a position to take CENVAT credit of this service tax paid on ocean freight 2 (Assuming the import relates to importation of inputs or capital goods);

B. When goods are supplied on CIF basis:

a. The foreign exporter undertakes to bear the ocean freight by entering into a contract with an Indian freight forwarder – In terms of Rule 10 of the POP Rules, the place of provision will be India, being the place of destination of imported goods. The Indian freight forwarder will be subject to payment of service tax on the freight amount, under the forward charge mechanism. However, no Cenvat credit of this service tax payable on ocean freight will be available to the Indian importer, being an added cost to the entire transaction.

b. The foreign exporter undertakes to bear the ocean freight by entering into a contract with a foreign freight forwarder –In this situation, both the service provider and service receiver are located outside India i.e., outside the taxable territory. This situation was earlier covered under the mega exemption notification providing exemption from payment of service tax. It was covered under the following entry (Sl. No. 34 of Notification No. 12/2012-ST):

"(34) services received from a provider of service located in a non-taxable territory by-

(c) a person located in a non-taxable territory "

By virtue of the above entry, ocean freight when payable by a foreign exporter to a foreign freight forwarder, was exempt from payment of service tax in India.

The above was creating an anomaly in the system that in all cases ocean freight is subject to payment of service tax, as detailed above, except this last situation. Accordingly, the law was recently amended to provide that the above exemption will not be available in respect of transportation of goods from a place outside India to the customs station of clearance in India . In other words, the situation wherein ocean freight when payable by a foreign exporter to a foreign freight forwarder, which was earlier not subject to service tax was sought to be brought within the service tax net, by removing the above exemption thereon.3 (Recently, it has been clarified vide CBEC circular No. 204/2/2017, that no service tax will be applicable on the services by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India to the customs station in India w.r.t. goods intended for transshipment to any country outside India).

As to who will be subject to payment of service tax, in this situation, it has been provided that the person in-charge of the vessel (who files the IGM with the customs authorities) will be liable for discharging the said service tax liability. These amendments have been carried out vide Notification No. 01/2017-ST, 02/2017-ST and 03/2017-ST dated 12.01.2017. Again, in this situation no CENVAT credit of the service tax paid will be available to the Indian importer adding to the cost of the entire transaction.

In both the above situations, wherein the imported goods are on CIF basis, the person in-charge of the vessel / freight forwarder, as the case may be, will recover the service tax amount from the foreign exporter. The foreign exporter will in turn recover this service tax amount from the Indian importer as a part of his cost of imported goods. This will in turn increase the assessable value of the imported items for the purpose of calculation of customs duty, further leading to added costs to the Indian importer.

The above scenarios can be understood hypothetically wherein the FOB value is INR 1000, ocean freight is INR 100, service tax is 4.5% and basic customs duty 4 (The impact of CVD and SAD has not been considered as the CENVAT credit of these duties will be available) is 30%. The insurance amount has been deemed to be zero. The impact of service tax on ocean freight on the cost of the Indian Importer, when the value is CIF or FOB, has been detailed below:

S.No.

Situation

Service Tax Payable (INR)

CENVAT Credit availability of service tax paid,to the Indian Importer

Customs Duty (INR)

Total Cost of the Transaction (INR)

When goods are supplied on FOB basis

 

The Indian importer enters into a contract with an Indian freight forwarder

4.5 (by Indian freight forwarder)

Yes

AV – 1100 5 (TRU letter of Ministry of Finance, circulated with the Budget Documents in February, 2016, has clarified that assessable value for customs duty calculation will not include the service tax paid on ocean freight)

CD – 330

1430 (1100 + 330)

ST paid will be available as CENVAT credit

 

The Indian importer enters into a contract with a Foreign freight forwarder

4.5 (by Indian importer)

Yes

AV – 1100

CD – 330

1430 (1100 + 330)

ST paid will be available as CENVAT credit

When goods are supplied on CIF basis

 

The foreign exporter enters into a contract with an Indian freight forwarder

4.5 (by Indian freight forwarder)

No

AV – 1104.5 6 (The foreign exporter will increase his cost by INR 4.5, towards the amount recovered as service tax from him either by the Indian freight forwarder / person – in – charge of the vessel.)

CD –331.35

1435.85 (1104.5 + 331.35)

 

The foreign exporter enters into a contract with a foreign freight forwarder

4.5 (by person in charge of the vessel)

No

AV – 104.5

CD – 31.35

1435.85 (1104.5 + 331.35)

Conclusion - From the above, matrix, it clear that bringing goods into India on FOB basis is more cost effective as compared to goods when imported into India, in the above context.In case of FOB valuation, the cost of the transaction (including freight and taxes) will be INR 1430, whereas in case of CIF valuation the cost of the transaction (including freight and taxes) will be INR 1435.85.The reason for the same has been detailed below:

a. The cost of service tax, in case of CIF valuation, will be recovered by the foreign exporter from the Indian importer as a part of his cost. This will in turn increase the customs duty element; and

b. The service tax payable, in case of CIF valuation will not be available as an CENVAT credit to the Indian Importer. On the other hand, in case of FOB valuation, the amount of service tax paid will be available as CENVAT credit to the Indian importer.

The above amount may appear to be very small in percentage terms of the overall cost but in situations wherein the freight amount is a lot,these small percentages may also run into very large sums of money.

(The author is Partner, RSA Legal Solutions and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

_______________________________________________________________________________

1 Assuming the import relates to importation of inputs or capital goods

2 Assuming the import relates to importation of inputs or capital goods

3 Recently, it has been clarified vide CBEC circular No. 204/2/2017, that no service tax will be applicable on the services by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from a place outside India to the customs station in India w.r.t. goods intended for transshipment to any country outside India .

4 The impact of CVD and SAD has not been considered as the CENVAT credit of these duties will be available

5 TRU letter of Ministry of Finance, circulated with the Budget Documents in February, 2016, has clarified that assessable value for customs duty calculation will not include the service tax paid on ocean freight

6 The foreign exporter will increase his cost by INR 4.5, towards theamount recovered as service tax from him either by the Indian freight forwarder / person – in – charge of the vessel.

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: CIF imports - Liability and cost of ST

According to me in CIF cases also cenvat credit of service tax can be taken based on the duty paid challan provided separate challans are raised for an importer/a consignment.

Without freight element bill can be raised by the shipping lines on importer for service tax alone by forwarding duty paid challan

Prior to the issuance of referred notifications in respect of CIF imports foreign exporter when they enter into a contract with foreign freight forwarder there was no service tax. But the same contract entered with Indian freight forwarder service tax is applicable. Now level playing field is provided by making foreign freight forwarder also liable to pay service tax. Person in charge of vessel and who files IGM i.e. shipping lines has been made liable to pay service tax.

Ideally nobody will entertain to include service tax cost in the price


Posted by govindan_mani govindan_mani
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.