News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Supply of services to SEZ Developer or Unit under GST law

MARCH 21, 2017

By Mohammad Salim, CA

UNDER the current Service Tax law the services received by a SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit and used by them for the authorized operations are exempted from whole of the service tax as per Notification No 12/2013-Service Tax dated 1st July 2013.

As per said notification, the exemption is provided by way of refund of service tax paid on the specified services received by SEZ Developer or an SEZ Unit and used for authorised operations. However, the notification further states that where the specified services received by SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit are used exclusively for the authorized operations, the person liable to pay service tax i.e. person providing service to SEZ Unit or Developer has the option not to pay service tax ab-initio, where the authorization in Form A-2 is provided by SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit to provider of the specified service and subject to other conditions as stated in the notification. Further the SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit has the option not to avail the exemption and instead take CENVAT Credit on the specified services in accordance with the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

Thus, under the current service tax regime,services provided to / received by SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit which are used for authorized operations is an exempted service. However SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit first needs to pay service tax to the service provider and later on claim refund of the same. However subject to certain conditions,ab-initio exemption is also available wherein the service provider will not charge service tax on the specified services provided to SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit and thus in such cases there is no need for claiming of refund. Also instead of claiming exemption such entities can also avail CENVAT Credit.

Now let's go through the provisions in respect of services received by SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit under the Revised Model GST Law. As per said Model Law the supply of services to SEZ Developer or Unit is a "Zero-rated supply". Zero rated supply means that the supply of service is taxable but is subject to NIL / zero rate of tax.

For ready reference the relevant text of Revised Model GST Law is reproduced below:-

CGST / SGST Act, 2016

Section 2(111): "Zero-rated supply" means supply of any goods and / or services in terms of section 15 of IGST Act, 2016

IGST Act, 2016

Section 2(29): "Zero-rated supply" means supply of any goods and / or services in terms of section 15 of IGST Act, 2016

Thus, all the three proposed statutes i.e. CGST, SGST and IGST Acts refers to Section 15 of IGST Act for the definition of zero rated supply. However, it appears that there has been an inadvertent error inasmuch as the correct section wherein the definition / meaning of zero rated supply is contained is Section 16 of IGST Act, 2016 and not section 15.

Be that as it may, the relevant extract of Section 16 of IGST Act is reproduced below:-

16. Zero rated supply

(1) "zero rated supply" means any of the following taxable supply of goods and/or services, namely -

(a) export of goods and/or services; or

(b) supply of goods and/or services to a SEZ developer or an SEZ unit.

(2) Subject to provisions of sub-section (3) of section 17 of the CGST Act, 2016, credit of input tax may be availed for making zero-rated supplies, notwithstanding that such supply may be an exempt supply.

(3)………………………………

(4) The SEZ developer or SEZ unit receiving zero rated supply specified in clause (a) of sub-section (1) shall be eligible, subject to the conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed in this regard, to claim refund of IGST paid by the registered taxable person on such supply.

As per sub section (4) (supra), the SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit receiving zero rated supply shall be eligible, subject to the conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed, to claim refund of IGST paid by the registered taxable person (i.e. SEZ developer or a SEZ unit) on such supply.

Now,a question comes to mind is why section 16(4) is speaking only about refund of IGST and not about refund of CGST and SGST which may also be applicable in cases where supply of service is made to a SEZ developer / Unit by a supplier located in the same state.

The answer to this lies in Section 3(6) of IGST Act, 2016 which states that supply of goods and / or services to or by a SEZ developer or a SEZ unit shall be deemed to be a supply of goods and / or services in the course of Inter-State trade or commerce . Further proviso to Section 4(2) of IGST Act mandates that the intra-state supply of services shall not include supply of services to or by a SEZ developer or to or by a SEZ unit. As the supply of services to SEZ Unit or Developer is treated as inter-state supply, accordingly,they will be exigible to IGST only and accordingly section 16(4) is referring only to refund of IGST.

Further, as per sub section (4) there is option of only claim of refund of IGST paid by the registered taxable person i.e. SEZ Developer or Unit and there is no option of ab-initio exemption which is presently available in the current service tax law.

So also, another option available currently wherein instead of claiming of exemption, CENVAT Credit is availed by SEZ developer or unit on service tax paid on specified services does not figure in the Revised Model GST law.

Therefore,it appears that the following two options currently available to a SEZ Developer or a SEZ Unit have been abolished under the Revised Model GST Law and there remains only the option of claim of refund:-

i) Ab-initio exemption of tax on services received by SEZ Developer or Unit.

ii) Not availing the exemption by SEZ Developer or Unit but taking the CENVAT Credit of tax paid on specified services.

Hopefully, issues such as these are sorted out in the days to come.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Regarding availability of credit to SEZ

I do not concur with the opinion as regards non-admissibility of cenvat credit to SEZ unit in GST regime. This is for the reason that the SEZ unit will export the goods and since the exports are considered as nil rated supply, the SEZ unit will also be eligible to avail cenvat credit.

CA PRADEEP JAIN



Posted by Pradeep Jain Jain
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.