News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Casual taken too seriously!!

MAY 18, 2017

By Vinay Bhushan, CA and Rajshree Lohia, Adv.

THE Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST"/ "the Act") which is promoted as bringing ease of compliance seems to introduce the burden of unnecessary compliance to the small business houses which render their services/trade in commodities mostly in the state to which they belong and only occasionally undertake transactions in other States where they are not registered. Under GST Regime a person who occasionally undertakes transaction where he has no fixed place of business shall be required to get registered in that State as well.

Under Section 22 of CGST every supplier is liable to be registered under this Act in the State or Union territory, from where he makes a taxable supply of goods or services or both, if his aggregate turnover in a financial year exceeds twenty lakh rupees (Rs. 10 lakhs for NE & Special Category States). However, section 24 provides for exceptions to the above section which means that even in the case the threshold limit of INR 20 Lakhs is not crossed the registration is obtained. One such exception is a casual taxable person.

The Act under Section 2(20) defines a casual taxable person to mean "a person who occasionally undertakes transactions involving supply of goods or services or both in the course or furtherance of business, whether as principal, agent or in any other capacity, in a State or a Union territory where he has no fixed place of business."

A casual taxable person is such taxpayer who occasionally undertakes transaction in a taxable territory (i.e., the territory to which the provisions of this Act apply) where he has no fixed place of business (i.e. a place through which the business of the supplier is wholly or partly carried on and is mentioned under the certificate of registration obtained under the Act)1. Now what happens to exhibitors, traders etc. supplying in exhibitions or trade fairs, groups conducting plays or circus in different cities?Do they also need to get registered in all the cities where they are exhibiting their products and entering into small, may be one-time sales or transactions? Yes, atleast the intention of the Act seems so which seeks to include every person whether working as a principal or as agent or in any other capacity.

As can be seen above, the definition provides that:

a. The transaction should involve supply of goods or services;

b. The person shall not have fixed place of business in the particular taxable territory.

Section 24 of the Act provides for compulsory registration of such taxpayers in the taxable territory, and the same shall be made at least 5 days prior to the commencement of the said business.The certificate of registration issued to a casual taxable person shall be valid for a period specified in the application for registration or ninety days from the effective date of registration, whichever is earlier, and such person shall make taxable supplies only after the issuance of the certificate of registration. The certificate is eligible for extension upon such request being made along with the deposit of an additional amount of tax equivalent to the estimated tax liability of such person for the period for which the extension is sought, as provided under Section27.

As if the registration burden was not enough, the causal taxpayer is also required to deposit an advance deposit of tax of an amount equivalent to the estimated tax liability of such person for the period for which the registration is sought. In an instance, where the ultimate tax liability of the casual taxpayer is more than the estimated tax liability, he shall make a deposit towards payment of such tax by internet banking or by using credit or debit cards or National Electronic Fund Transfer or Real Time Gross Settlement or by such other mode and subject to such condition sand restrictions as may be prescribed, which shall be credited to the electronic cash ledger of such taxpayer, akin to a regular taxpayer under the Act.

Additionally, the casual taxpayer is mandatorily required to file returns as any other taxable person. Furthermore, Section 54 (13) clearly states that such taxpayer is not entitled to any refund, unless he has, in respect of the entire period for which the certificate of registration granted to him had remained in force and furnished all the returns required as prescribed under Section 39 the Act.

It does not matter whether a person is making the supply of Rs. 100/- or Rs. 1,00,000/-.The causal taxpayer is required to take registration, deposit advance tax, file return as no minimum threshold has been provided for this provision and it has been explicitly stated that the threshold provided in the Act shall not be applicable on the casual taxable person. The definition covers principal as well as agents, providing no threshold limit, making the provision applicable even on small vendors carrying out any activity on short-term basis.

In other words, all persons supplying taxable goods and services in a taxable territory shall be covered under GST regime irrespective of income earned by them.

Persons from various sectors may fall under the ambit of casual taxpayers, for instance, B2C transactions, persons conducting circus, freelance workers, people undertaking seasonal businesses, etc. In certain cases it would be determined on case to case basis, for example, an apparel boutique owner participating in an exhibition-cum-sale in another city, would fall under this category. But, if she sends the consignment from her registered store, then it would be an inter-state sale and would not require his registration as a casual taxable person.

The facts of each case will determine whether or not it would be a case of an inter-state supply or one falling in the category of supply by a casual taxable person. What happens in the instances where both the place of supply and the location of the supplier is in a territory where he doesn't have a fixed place of business? On the basis of existing provisions, it appears that registration as a casual taxable person may be required in such instances.

Another exception to a regular taxpayer under the Act is a non-resident taxpayer. A non-resident taxable person is one who occasionally undertakes transactions involved in supply of goods or services but has no fixed place of business residence in India. A key difference between a casual taxable person and non-resident taxable person is the holding of a PAN number. The former has a PAN number and the latter generally does not. But, non-resident taxpayer who has PAN number may take registration as a casual taxable person. A non-resident taxable person has to file a separate simplified return unlike a regular or casual taxpayer. The relevancy of the above provision is questionable, as why would a non- resident taxpayer want to increase its compliance requirements and formalities by registering as a causal taxpayer.

The introduction of registration of casual taxpayers could be considered as a welcome move bringing in greater transparency, preventing tax avoidance and evasion. In parallel, it would also have consequences, with not only increasing the compliance requirements but affecting the suppliers of the lower income groups in majority because of the absence of the threshold limit. Constitutionally, the concept of equality among equals is followed, upon which the progressive taxing system in India is based, in order to maintain social equality. But, the no threshold provision is contrary to the same. Therefore, an amendment to the said provision, inserting a threshold similar to that for regular taxpayers under the GST regime, could help reduce the harsh consequences such lower groups will have to face.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

1 Sec. 2 (85): place of business includes–– (a) a place from where the business is ordinarily carried on, and includes a warehouse, a godown or any other place where a taxable person stores his goods, supplies or receives goods or services or both; or (b) a place where a taxable person maintains his books of account; or (c) a place where a taxable person is engaged in business through an agent, by whatever name called.

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 8 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 7 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.