News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Supplies to and from SEZ units: Taxation under GST Regime

MAY 24, 2017

By Rajat Dosi & Kumar Harshvardhan

WITH much of the anticipated GST law already in black and white, and the self-imposed deadline fast approaching, it will be safe to assume that the basic premise or the contours of the GST law (available in public domain) will remain the same, and there will not be any unexpected sea of changes when the GST is rolled out on July 01, 2017. Bearing this in mind, let us have a look at the mechanism for supplies to and from SEZ under the GST regime.

Supplies to SEZ from DTA

In the existing law, supply of goods from DTA to SEZ are considered as export outside India; and the DTA supplier enjoys the following benefits:

a. exemption from payment of applicable central excise duty – full exemption (rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules) or exemption by way of refund (rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules or rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules)

b. exemption from CST; and

c. exemption from VAT in most of the states.

Since such supplies are akin to exports, the supplier also enjoys the benefit of either duty drawback or the advance authorization scheme (allowing him to import or procure duty free inputs for supplies to SEZ).

Similarly, services supplied from DTA enjoy exemption from payment of service tax, by way of either full exemption or refund (Notification No. 12/2013-ST dated 01.07.2013).

Under the IGST Act, 2017, supplies to SEZ have been deemed to be inter-state supplies; meaning thereby, that such supplies will only suffer from the levy of IGST, and will not be subjected to CGST and SGST.

Such supplies havebeen considered as ‘zero rated supplies', making the supplier eligible to claim input tax credit on input and input services in respect of such supplies, notwithstanding whether or not such supplies are exempt.

Further, it has been provided that the supplier will be entitled to, either of the following options:

a. Make supplies to SEZ without payment of applicable IGST(basis bond or letter of undertaking) and avail refund of input tax credit availed in respect of supplies made to the SEZ; and

b. Make supplies on payment of applicable IGST and avail refund of the said IGST.

The benefit of duty drawback and the advance authorization scheme, which flows from the provisions of the SEZ Act, will continue under the GST regime.

Thus, there is no effective change in terms of supply of goods or services or both to SEZ from DTA. Supply of goods and service will continue to be exempt, and the option to go for upfront ab initio exemption or exemption by way of refund rests with the DTA supplier. Having said that, as GST proposes to do away with the looming protectionism measures adopted by the States, supplies to SEZ from DTA would no longer be subjected to the payment of VAT, and all supplies will enjoy exemption from IGST.

Supplies from SEZ to DTA

Presently,supplies of goods from SEZ to DTA are considered as import into India. The DTA buyer is considered to be importer of such goods into India. He is obligated to file a bill of entry with the customs authorities posed at the SEZ (for the convenience of the business community, SEZs have been empowered to file a bill of entry on behalf of the DTA buyer). Such supplies are subjected to customs duty i.e., BCD, CVD, Cess and SAD, as applicable, on import of such goods into India.

On the other hand, supply of services is subject to payment of applicable service tax by the SEZ unit.

Under the IGST Act, 2017, even supplies from SEZ have been considered to be ‘inter-state' supplies.

Under the GST regime, supply of goods will continue to be considered as import into India and be subjected to payment of customs duty, as will be mandated under the SEZ Act. However, the said customs duty would comprise of BCD and IGST.

In respect of supply of services, the same will be subject to payment of applicable IGST, unless the GST council puts the same under the reverse charge mechanism.

Thus, in terms of supplies from SEZ to DTA too, there is no effective change in law. The only variation is that in lieu of CVD and SAD (in case of goods) and service tax (in case of services), the supplier will bear / pay IGST.

Registration

Going by the GST law, SEZ units involved solely in exports, and supply of goods to DTA, would not be liable to pay any tax under the GST law. Further, in case the GST Council does decide to shift the onus for payment of IGST for supply of service from SEZ to DTA on the recipient of services, i.e., employs the mechanism of reverse charge, no taxes under the GST regime will have to be paid by SEZ units providing services to DTA.

In light of the above, the fundamental question that is to be considered is whether or not is a SEZ required to take registration?

The same is not clear from the proposed provisions. Section 23(1) of the said Act absolves every person exclusively engaged in the business of supplying goods or services or both that are either exempt or not liable to tax from the registration formality. Be that as it may, Section 24(1) of the CGST Act mandatesevery person making any inter-State taxable supply , irrespective of their aggregate turnover, to be registered under the Act. Additionally, the revised GST Registration Rules mandates each unit in the SEZ to make a separate application for registration as a business vertical, distinct from its other units located in the DTA.

It can be seen that neither Section 23, nor Section 24 has an overriding effect on the other, meaning that, at this point, it cannot be safely concluded as to whether the SEZs are to take registration under GST or not.

An implication can be drawn that in order to stimulate exports and help SEZ get back its lost sheen, the legislature might have mostly kept SEZ outside the incremental compliance burden structure as well as the looming trade protectionism measures that are going to get installed, almost inevitably, with the implementation of GST. In case the mandate to take registration is done away with and the supply of services from SEZ to DTA is put under the reverse charge mechanism, SEZ in India would truly become a Free Trade Zone.

(The authors – Rajat Dosi is Partner & Kumar Harsh vardhan is Associate – Indirect Taxation, RSA Legal Solutions and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

 

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 8 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 7 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.