News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Public Scrutiny under GST: Complying with Rating Regime

JUNE 05, 2017

By Priyojeet Chatterjee, Advocate

AS we move forward enacting a new indirect tax regime/GST, overseeing a paradigm shift, we find compliance being the soul of such change. Under the CGST Act, Section 149 establishes a mechanism for compliance rating. Similar provisions are mutatis mutandis made applicable under Section 20 of IGST Act and Section 21 of UTGST Act. The intention behind establishing a rating mechanism is to change the psychological perception of doing business by making information available in public domain for ‘risk averment' for the next stage supplier or manufacturer.The good part of the concept is that this provides option to choose a supplier who offers not only competitive prices but also has a better compliance rating. This helps in mitigating unwanted risks as the rating will be available in the public domain.

Under the proposed regime, compliance rating will play a very vital role in mitigating risk in terms of re-alignment of Input Tax Credit in circumstances of non-payment of consideration or non-filling of Return by the supplier, as under the new ITC Mechanism, credit is available only on matching of invoices. A manufacturer may not take credit if the supplier has not filed returns or not paid the tax liability to the government kitty. ITC is very crucial for MSME as it eases the load on their working capital. An intelligent rating system may equip manufacturers to procure supplies from high rated supplier in order to avail seamless credit. The relevant portion is extracted below:

2. Reversal of input tax credit in case of non-payment of consideration

(1) A registered person, who has availed of input tax credit on any inward supply of goods or services or both, but fails to pay to the supplier thereof the value of such supply along with the tax payable thereon within the time limit specified in the second proviso to sub-section (2) of section 16, shall furnish the details of such supply, the amount of value not paid and the amount of input tax credit availed of proportionate to such amount not paid to the supplier in FORM GSTR-2 for the month immediately following the period of one hundred and eighty days from the date of issue of invoice.

Benefits at Large

The triggering factor of the compliance rating is that this will be available in public domain and with such information, business decisions are expected to be more prudent. As a taxable person with higher rating may enjoy certain privileges while a lower rating be will more precarious to scrutiny. The rating mechanism will also ensure that a non-compliant person is black listed. The proposed mechanism is similar to ‘Denied Entities List” (Black List) provided under Rule 7 of Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993.

The compliance rating will be based on following factors:

-  Regular payment of taxes

-  Timely filling of Returns

-  Matching of transaction of outward and inward supplies

-  Transparent reconciliation.

-  Ease in dealing with GST Department

Black Listing of firms/suppliers will be based on following factors:

-  A person who will default in filling of returns,

-  Continuous short reporting of sales beyond 6 months and

-  Continuous default for 3 months in ITC which has been reversed.

The intention behind such a law is also to enlarge the tax base through mandatory reporting of transactions and ensure that maximum business entities are subscribed under the new regime.

Why such compliance is nightmare for small and marginal entities?

The hullabalo o of GST is such that every manufacturer is engaged in either risk assessment or educating his suppliers on the changes to be made under the proposed regime. A rating mechanism like this may deter spirit of small suppliers/marginal suppliers. Business in India is still by and large operating on cash and expecting a paradigm shift in a very short period is just too much. We must acknowledge that we are uprooting a system which is almost 100 years old and planting a new customized system. On the top of that GST enactment is designed in such a way that registration is optional only for namesake. Provision with regards to supply made from a un-registered person to a registered person is such that onus of discharging the tax liability is on the registered person upfront and then he has to take credit of it, virtually making it difficult for non-registered persons to survive in the industry. A compliance rating like this might also deter the spirit of small and marginal suppliers who are above 20 lac but below 2 crores and not equipped with the desired skills or technology. The available manpower to deal with such compliance is not adequate and black listing is too rigorous. It is apparent that there will be some altercations in the initial period and the acclimatization with such change will take some time. Implementation of the regime will increase the requirement of working capital for small suppliers and to meet such demand particularly those who are supplying to e-commerce firms on cut throat prices will need additional funds from banks or other institutions. This will increase the cost of operations indirectly.

Conclusion

It is now very clear that GST is the future. However, it is imperative to move with caution in such paradigm shift. Rating is an absolutely brilliant idea, if there is adequate infrastructure and manpower. A person/supplier sitting in far distant village cannot be expected to file returns over night and with denial of input credit, the stage supplier will run away. In these circumstances some leeway should be given so that the proposed regime should not be a detriment in doing business instead of bringing ease. It is equally important that small and marginal suppliers/entrepreneurs may be provided with some basic training. The cost of implementing GST is always an added expenditure for them. It would be better if a window period of 6 months is provided for suppliers who have a turnover less than 2 crores in the preceding year.

(The author is a practicing Advocate working with YSR & Associates, Hyderabad and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 8 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 7 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.