News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST Path - XXI - Rule 7 of ITC Rules

JUNE 06, 2017

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

PRESENT Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 deals with a situation where a manufacturer is manufacturing both dutiable and exempted goods or a service provider providing both taxable and exempted service and hence it becomes necessary to determine the proportion of eligible cenvat credit admissible out of the common credits. Similar provisions are incorporated in Rule 7 of the GST ITC Rules (Draft), which appear to be more cumbersome than the present Rule 6 of the CCR, 2004. But one solace is that in GST era, the instances of exemptions would be highly limited and hence the application of this Rule 7 also would be limited. Further, the operation of this rule would mostly be automated though the requirement of human intervention in identifying the nature of various credits is not ruled out.

The basic facts and principles behind Rule 7 may be noted to understand it better.

It may be noted that when all suppliers correctly upload the details of their outward supplies, the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) of the recipient would exhibit all his inward supplies and corresponding Input Tax Credit (T).

But at this stage, the eligibility or otherwise of the credit has not been determined.

At the first level, the following invoices have to be identified and credit pertaining to such invoices should be eliminated from the ECL.

i) Goods and services, exclusively used for non business purposes (T1).

ii) Goods and services, exclusively used for making exempted supplies (T2).

iii) Goods and services, for which credit is not allowed under Section 17 (5) (T3).

The balance credit would represent the total eligible credit (C1), from which the ineligible portion pertaining to exempted supplies has to be identified.

Next step would be identifying those invoices, where the goods and services are used exclusively for making taxable supplies and zero rated supplies. This credit is fully entitled (T4).

(C1) – (T4) would be the common credit and denoted as C2

The proportion of value of exempted supplies to total turnover in every month, shall be applied to the common credit and this would represent the ineligible credit for that month. This should be added to the output tax liability of the month. In any month, if there is either no exempted supplies or no turnover, the previous month figures can be taken.

Credit attributable to exempt supplies D1 = C2 * E/F.

C2 = Common Credit.

E = Value of exempt supplies in the tax period.

F – Total turnover for the tax period.

D1 should be added to the output tax liability of the tax period.

Credit pertaining to goods and services used for non business purposes is to be taken as 5 % of the total common credit and the same shall also be added to the output tax liability (D2).

Once the financial year is over, the same exercise has to be done with reference to the value of exempted supplies and total turnover pertaining to the whole financial year. If the ineligible credit thus calculated at the year end is more than the amount already added to output tax liability every month, the differential amount has to be paid, before September. Interest has to be paid from 1 st April of succeeding year till the date of payment. For example, for the year 2017-18, the final calculation has to be made and the shortage, if any, has to be paid before September 2018 and interest on the shortage has to be paid from 01.04.2018 to the date of payment of the shortage.

If the amount added to output tax liability every month exceeds the amount calculated for the whole year, the additional amount paid has to be claimed back as credit not later than September in the next financial year.

The below sample calculation would further explain the application of Rule 7.

 

Operation of Rule 7 of the GST ITC Rules

S.No.

Details

Code

Amount

Remarks

1

Total Credit credited in the Electronic Credit Ledger on all inward supplies of goods and services.

T

1500000

Based on all details as uploaded by the suppliers.

2

Credit attributable to inputs and input services, used exclusively for non business purposes

T1

15000

Totally ineligible

T1, T2 and T3 are fully in-eligible credits. This should be identified invoice wise and declared in GSTR 2

 

 

3

Credit attributable to inputs and input services, used exclusively for making exempted supplies

T2

25000

Totally ineligible

4

Ineligible credit as per Section 17 (5)

T3

40000

Totally ineligible

5

Total amount of credit to be credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger

C1 = T-(T1+T2+T3)

1420000

Total eligible credit, subject to proportionate reversal. This amount is already being reflected in the Electronic Credit Ledger

6

Out of C1 above, credit attributable to inputs and input services, which are exclusively used for making taxable supplies and zero rated supplies.

T4

22000

This credit is fully entitled and is already reflecting in Electronic Credit Ledger

7

Common Credit (5) - (6)

C2 = C1 - T 4

1398000

This should be subjected to proportionate entitlement and is already reflecting in Electronic Credit Ledger

 

Out of the above common credit, credit attributable to exempt supplies - D1 shall be determined, by using the formula C2 * E/F. E = Valule of exempted supplies in the tax period. F = Total turnover in the tax period.

8

Let us assume, value of exempted supply in the tax period as

1,20,00,000

 

 

 

9

Let us assume, Total turnover in the tax period as

5,00,00,000

 

 

 

10

Common credit attributable to exempt supplies.

D1

335520

1398000 * (1.2 Cr / 5.0 Cr)

 

11

Common credit attributable to non business purposes

D2

69900

As per Rule this would be 5 % of C2

 

12

Eligible Common Credit

C3 = C2 - (D1+D2)

992580

 

 

13

D1 and D2 is liable to be reversed and hence added to the output tax liability

 

405420

 

 

14

Net Credit availed.

T 4 + C 3

1014580

 

 

 

Cross Check

 

 

15

Total amount originally reflecting in Electronic Credit Ledger

 

1500000

 

 

16

T1, T2, T3 removed

 

80000

 

 

17

Balance amount reflecting in Electronic Credit Ledger now

 

1420000

 

 

18

Credit attributable to exempt supplies (D1) and Non business purpose (D2), which is added to the output tax liability

 

405420

 

 

19

Net credit availed (17) - (18)

 

1014580

 

 

 

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 8 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 7 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.