News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - 'Non-encashment of cheques' would not save 'entries of credit' appearing in books of a/c for which no plausible explanation was furnished, from rigours of Sec 68: HC

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, JUNE 12, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether 'non-encashment of cheques' would save the 'entries of credit' appearing in books of a/c for which no plausible explanation was furnished, from the rigours of Section 68. NO is the verdict.

Facts of the case:

The assessee has been a company engaged in manufacturing and trading of activated bleaching earth. The assessee, in the relevant year, had credited account of six persons in the books of accounts as having received advance by way of unsecured loans from those persons. The AO by applying sec 68 of the Act, treated the said amount as income of the assessee chargeable to tax. The appeal of the assessee before the CIT(A) and Tribunal failed. Counsel for the assessee argued that in view of the findings recorded by the authorities the payment of the aforesaid amount of Rs.15,00,000/- shown as unsecured loan was received by means of different cheques but these cheques were never presented and encashed and, as such, the entry in the books of accounts regarding the sum only shows hypothetical income which could not be subjected to tax.

On appeal, the HC held that,

++ in the case at hand, there is no dispute that the assessee had received cheques for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- and entries in this regard were made in his books of accounts having received the said amount by way of unsecured loans from various persons. The assessee has also offered an explanation regarding the above entries but the explanation was not found to be satisfactory by the Assessing Officer and it was held that the aforesaid entries were in the nature of accommodation entries so as to raise bogus liabilities.The submission is that the entry of credit in the books of accounts may be relevant only when there is a cash transaction and not where the payment is through the cheques unless the cheques are cleared and encashed.Section 68 of the Act is clear enough as it uses the term "sum is found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee". It does not make any distinction between any cash or cheque transaction. The sum found credited in the books of accounts of the assessee includes within its fold, the entry either by way of cash or by cheque irrespective of the encashment of the cheques.In view of the above, both the essential conditions for applicability of Section 68 of the Act stands fulfilled. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, we answer the question of law, as formulated above, in favour of the revenue and against the assessee and hold that despite non-encashment of the cheques by the assessee, the entries of credit appearing in his books of accounts for which no plausible explanation to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer was furnished would attract Section 68 of the Act and the sum so credited by the entries would be deemed to be income of the assessee chargeable to tax.

(See 2017-TIOL-1086-HC-ALL-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.