News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Restricted exemption to sports under GST

JUNE 15, 2017

By S Sivakumar, LL.B., FCA, FCS, ACSI, MBA, Advocate

IN terms of the current Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012-ST dated 20-6-2012 the following activity covered by Sl. No. 8 is exempted from levy of service tax, viz.

"Services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to arts, culture or sports".

However, under Sl. No. 61 of the exemption list of services under GST, the following activity is exempted from levy of tax, viz.

Services by way of training or coaching in recreational activities relating to,-

(i) arts or culture. or

(ii) sports by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of Income tax Act, 1961;

Under the existing law, exemption from the levy of service tax in respect of services related to arts or culture or sports is available to all service providers, irrespective of whether they are registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or not. Now, under the GST law, exemption from the levy of tax would be available only to entities that are registered under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at least, insofar as sports is concerned. As a student of tax laws, I presume that, going by the manner in which this exemption entry under Sl. No. 61 is worded, the requirement related to registration under Section 12AA of the Income tax Act, is applicable only to training or coaching in recreational activities related to sports (and not to arts or culture).

Be that as it may…Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act deals with entities that are registered as religious or charitable trusts. While one can understand some connection between religious/charitable trusts and arts/cultural activities, one completely fails to understand the connection between sports and religious/charitable trusts.

Under the current service tax law, exemption is available to sports related activities carried out by commercial training institutes and sports clubs who are not registered under Section 12AA of the Income tax Act. In a cosmopolitan city like Bangalore, one can find umpteen establishments that train youngsters in sports like cricket, badminton, table tennis, football, etc. Now, all of these establishments will have to charge tax under GST, to the utter detriment of the sports fraternity.

I wonder if the Sports Ministry is aware of this dangerous development related to sports, under GST. To restrict the exemption related to sports under GST, to religious or charitable trusts seems completely bereft of logic. One does hope that the Central Government amends Entry No. 61 of the exemption list under GST to delete reference to Section 12AA of the Income tax Act, to ensure that the benefit of exemption that is currently available to all players is not restricted to religious or charitable trusts.

Interestingly, the Tabulation notifying the list of services which are exempted carries the caption "Service Tax Exemptions to be continued in GST as decided by GST Council".

The usage of the word "continued" would presuppose that the services that were exempted earlier under the FA, 1994 continue to be exempted under the GST regime. But as highlighted in the preceding paragraphs, the addition of the words "by charitable entities registered under section 12AA of Income tax Act, 1961" makes the exemption go topsy-turvy.

If this is an unintended gaffe, which it seems to be, it would be in the interest of all concerned to rectify it quickly.

Incidentally, the full-stop/period appearing in the clause (i) of Sl. No. 61 (supra) also appears to be a typographical error.

Are we going to carry the legacy of such unbridled errors from the earlier taxation regime into the metamorphosed one? Hopefully, not!

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 8 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

GST RO(W)AD AHEAD | Episode 7 | Panel Discussion | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.