News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Fusion of Confusions in GST provisions

JUNE 20, 2017

By P G James

"CES-SANTE Ratione Legis Cessat Ipsa Lex" - "Reason is the soul of the law, and when the reason of any particular law ceases, so does the Law itself."

[Supreme Court in Shri Swamiji of Shri Admar Mutt etc. vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept. and Ors.-AIR 1980 SC 1.]

For the following uncertainties and doubts in the GST Act, there seems to be no plausible reason for exclusion or deviation from the existing tax provisionsand several queries raised from different angles still remains unanswered and also not clarified by the Board or GST Council.

1. Sec 140 (5) - Transitional Provisions- Capital Goods in transit as on 30th June

(5) A registered person shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, credit of eligible duties and taxes in respect of inputs or input services received on or after the appointed day but the duty or tax in respect of which has been paid by the supplier under the existing law, subject to the condition that the invoice or any other duty or tax paying document of the same was recorded in the books of accounts of such person within a period of thirty days from the appointed day:

Provided that the period of thirty days may, on sufficient cause being shown, be extended by the Commissioner for a further period not exceeding thirty days:

Provided further that said registered person shall furnish a statement, in such manner as may be prescribed, in respect of credit that has been taken under this sub-section.

Tax paid on Input and Input Services under the earlier law, but received within one month after the appointed day is permitted to be taken credit in electronic credit ledger. But there is no mention about Capital Goods.

However, as an answer to Qn No 24(3) of the FAQ published by CBEC on 31.03.17, it has been stated as follows:

Q 3. A registered person, say, purchases capital goods under the existing law (Central Excise) in the June quarter of 2017-18. Though the invoice has been received within 30th June but the capital goods are received on 5th July 2017 (i.e. in GST regime). Will such a person get full credit of CENVAT in GST regime?

Ans. Yes, he will be entitled to credit in 2017-18 provided such a credit was admissible as CENVAT credit in the existing law and is also admissible as credit in CGST - section 140(2) of the CGST Act.

Sec 140(2) covers situations of carrying forward unavailed credit not carried forward in a Return, as for instance, 50% credit of goods received during the period April-June deferred for taking credit in April, 2018. There is no enabling provision in the Act for taking credit of Capital Goods received in July, the Invoice of which is raised prior to 1st July, 2017.

2. Sec 140 (5) - Transitional Provisions- Input services on which tax paid earlier but received after appointed day

(5) A registered person shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, credit of eligible duties and taxes in respect of inputs or input services received on or after the appointed day but the duty or tax in respect of which has been paid by the supplier under the existing law , subject to the condition that the invoice or any other duty or tax paying document of the same was recorded in the books of account of such person within a period of thirty days from the appointed day:

The above transitional provision presumably takes care of situations wherein tax has been provided on advances for a service provided or agreed to be provided as per Sec 66 B of Finance Act 1994.

Following issues emerge out of this:

a) Services for which advances were received may not be rendered after 30 days from the appointed date.

b) Even if the document is recorded in the books of accounts within 30 days or extended period of another 30 days after the appointed day, without the actual receipt of services, how can the credit be taken?

c) In the case of services received, tax paid and Invoices raised prior to the appointed date, how the credit will be taken after the appointed date. As per existing Rules, Invoice can be raised within 30 days of rendering service and for Banks and financial institutions it is 45 days. Even if Invoice is raised on 30th June, such Invoices will be received by the recipient after the appointed day only.

d) In the case of services rendered prior to the appointed date attracting reverse charge, how the credit will be taken for payment made after the appointed day?

3. Sec 140 (1) - Transitional Provisions- carry forward of Cenvat balances as per last return

140. (1) A registered person, other than a person opting to pay tax under section 10, shall be entitled to take, in his electronic credit ledger, the amount of CENVAT credit carried forward in the return relating to the period ending with the day immediately preceding the appointed day , furnished by him under the existing law in such manner as may be prescribed:

Last return filed for Service providers is for the half year period ended on 31st March, 17 due on 25th April. Subsequent Return for the period April to June is due for filing on 25th October as of now. There is no clarity on how to transfer Input Service credit balance as on 30th June to the electronic credit ledger .

4. Section 20 (2)–ISD turnover

Explanation:

(c) the term ‘turnover', in relation to any registered person engaged in the supply of taxable goods as well as goods not taxable under this Act , means the value of turnover, reduced by the amount of any duty or tax levied under entry 84 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution and entry 51 and 54 of List II of the said Schedule.

As per the existing Rule 5(1) of CCR, turnover of goods as well as value of all services of previous year are to be considered for arriving at the value of turnover. For a registered person engaged in the supply of services, method of calculating turnover for distribution of credit is not specified.

5. Sec 15– Value of taxable supply

15. (1) The value of a supply of goods or services or both shall be the transaction value, which is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply are not related and the price is the sole consideration for the supply.

(2) The value of supply shall include–––

(a) any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any law for the time being in force other than this Act, the State Goods and Services Tax Act, the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act , if charged separately by the supplier;

A tax paid under IGST is missed out for exclusion in arriving at the value of supply. This would imply that when goods procured under IGST is further supplied, value shall include IGST also, i.e., tax on tax.

There is no separate valuation rules for IGST and as per Sec 20 of IGST Act provisions of CGST Act related to value of supply shall apply mutatis mutandis to IGST Act also.

20. Subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act relating to,––

(i) scope of supply;

(ii) composite supply and mixed supply;

(iii) time and value of supply;

xx

xx

shall, mutatis mutandis, apply, so far as may be, in relation to integrated tax as they apply in relation to central tax as if they are enacted under this Act:

Since the ‘Appointed day' as committed is nearing, it is imperative that the above issues are clarified on priority rather that adopting the usual policy of ‘Let the Courts decide'.

In passing:

"Ubi Jus Incertum, Ibi Jus Nullum- Where the law is uncertain there is no law"

GST Rollout - Are We Ready? - Episode 2 (Concluded)

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.