News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Zero Rated Supply: An unsolved Mystery

JULY 12, 2017

By Siddartha Bhatt, Advocate

MUCH awaited GST has been implemented from 01-07-2017. As promised, GST has made fundamental changes in the understanding of concepts of indirect taxation in India, traversing from manufacture / sale / service to Supply. It has also cleared various statutes levying various taxes on the same leg of transaction and unified everything into one tax known as GST.

1. Problem Statement

Zero Rated Supply

1.1. In terms of Section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017, supplies which are made to a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) or physical exports are treated as Zero Rated Supplies. Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has issued a Circular No. 26/2017-Customs dated 01-07-2017 under the powers of IGST Act, which explains the export procedures. Neither Section 16 of IGST Act nor the Circular dated 01-07-2017 explains the procedures for making Zero Rated Supply .

Section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017

1.2. Zero Rated supply is defined under Section 16 of the IGST Act, 2017 as follows:

16. (1) "zero rated supply" means any of the following supplies of goods or services or both, namely:-

(a) export of goods or services or both; or

(b) supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit.

(2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (5) of section 17 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, credit of input tax may be availed for making zero-rated supplies, notwithstanding that such supply may be an exempt supply.

(3) A registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim refund under either of the following options, namely: –

(a) he may supply goods or services or both under bond or Letter of Undertaking, subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed, without payment of integrated tax and claim refund of unutilised input tax credit; or

(b) he may supply goods or services or both, subject to such conditions, safeguards and procedure as may be prescribed, on payment of integrated tax and claim refund of such tax paid on goods or services or both supplied, in accordance with the provisions of section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act or the rules made thereunder.

1.3. Section 16(1) supra identifies what supplies are treated as Zero Rated Supplies. Section 16(2) provides three aspects:

i. Restrictions for taking ITC would apply to zero rated supplies as well;

ii. Credit of ITC may be availed against a zero rated supply;

iii. Credit of ITC may be availed against a zero rated supply even though such supply is exempts supply;

1.4. Exempt supply is defined under Section 2(47) of CGST Act, 2017 to mean supplies attracting nil rate of tax or supplies which are wholly exempt from tax or non-taxable supplies.

1.5. Section 16(3) provides method of refunds against zero-rated supplies.

2. Analysis of the Problem

2.1. Let us understand where is the problem in the arrangement of Section 16 and scenarios of supplies.

2.2. Section 16(1) says supply made to SEZ and physical exports qualify as zero-rated supply. Section 16(2) says supplier can take ITC on zero-rated supplies even though such supplies are exempted. Section 16(3) provides two ways of claiming refund against a zero rated supply.

2.3. Section 16(3) starts with expression "A registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim refund under either of the following options". Hence the scope of Section 16 (3) is only towards how a registered person can claim refund against a zerorated supply. Section 16(3) provides two methods for claiming refund:

i. supply under bond or Letter of Undertaking, without payment of IGST and claim refund of unutilised input tax credit OR

ii. supply on payment of IGST and claim refund of such tax paid as per Section 54 of CGST Act or the Rules made thereunder.

2.4. Conversely, if a zero rated supplier does not intend to claim refund of ITC or output IGST, he need not refer to Section 16(3), as the same deals only with methodology of making zero rated supply by a registered person intending to claim refund.

2.5. Therefore, what remains is Section 16 (1) and 16(2). Section 16 (1) only identifies what are zero rated supplies. What is left is only Section 16(2) which provides that a zero rated supplier can take credit of ITC notwithstanding such supply is an exempt supply.

2.6. Hence the supplier is left with only one option, viz., exploring the possibility of making a zero-rated supply under Sec. 16(2).

3. Circular No. 26/2017-Customs

3.1. In the meanwhile, CBEC has issued a Circular No. 26/2017-Cus., dated 01-07-2017 detailing the export procedures. The said Circular, in its opening paragraph reads as follows:

Goods and Service Tax has become operational from 01-07-2017 in the GST regime, the governing provisions related to exports are contained in section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act). Supplies of goods and services for exports have been categorized as 'Zero Rated Supply' implying that goods could be exported under bond or Letter of Undertaking without payment of integrated tax followed by claim of refund of unutilized input tax credit or on payment of integrated tax with provision for refund of the tax paid.

[Emphasis supplied]

3.2. The Circular states that it implies the supplier has only two options to undertake a zero rated supply which are as per Sec. 16(3) (a) and (b). However, the Circular is conveniently silent about the basic and fundamental aspect of Sec. 16(3) which is only meant for claiming refund by a registered supplier and not the method of making zero rated supply.

3.3. The question that remains is "can a supplier make a zero rated supply without payment of IGST and without issuing bond / LuT while taking the ITC in terms of Sec. 16(2) and not seeking refund?" If not, why? Where does the GST law compel that a zero rated supply shall be made only in terms of Sec. 16(3) of the IGST Act?

4. Impact on the Trade

4.1. Small time exporters or suppliers to SEZ units/ developers will get affected if the Board does not provide an option to make zero rated supply without payment of IGST and without bond/LuT while taking ITC and not seeking refund.

4.2. Though, neither Sec. 16 nor Rule 96A of CGST Rules, 2017 providing any specific provision for execution of bank guarantee against bond or LuT, the Bond / LuT and Form GST RFD-11 declaration issued by the Board (CBEC) wants the supplier to provide details of bank guarantee.

4.3. It is to be noted that such procedural requirements would bring cash crunch to an exporter or a supplier making zero rated supplies. In addition, the procedural compliance and documentation makes the zero rated supplies less attractive.

5. Conclusion

In the light of the aforesaid discussions,I am of the view that the trading community should represent to the Board to issue a Circular clarifying that in case of a zero rated supply made without claim of refund, while ITC has been availed on the inputs and without charging IGST should be allowed without the hassles of Bond/LuT backed with Bank Guarantee. Alternatively, a simple Form like ARE-1 can be prescribed by which the supplier can close the loop by providing proof of export (shipping bills) or bill of export for SEZ supplies.

(The author is Joint Partner, Lakshmi kumaran & Sridharan, Bangalore and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Invoice for supply to SEZ

DTA supplier supplying goods to SEZ, which invoice he has prepared, Tax Invoice or Export Invoice?

Posted by AJAYMODIMODI AJAYMODIMODI
 
Sub: Zero Rated Supply- An unsolved Mystery

Dear Siddartha,
You have very well highlighted the issues related to supply to SEZ specially faced by small business.
Infact there are so many vendors who do not want to fall into compliance formalities related export on their small supplies to SEZ.
Hence government should also make provision where SEZ unit has procured material or Services on payment of IGST after matching of invoice in GSTN the amount of IGST will be refunded to SEZ unit.

With Regards,
Vikas Agarwal

Posted by Vikas Ji Agarwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.