News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
Cooperative society entitled to Sec 80P(2)(a)(i) benefits on interest from FDs: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

BANGALORE, JULY 13, 2017: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether a co-operative society is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) on the interest earned on the FDs placed with banks, this being a part of its business income. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case:

The assessee, a cooperative society filed return for relevant AY in which it had claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The AO was of the opinion that the assessee fell within the definition of a cooperative bank given in clause (ccv) of Section 5 of the Banking Regulations Act, 1949. Therefore, according to him, sub-section (4) of section 80P stood attracted. The said sub-section specifically stated that the provisions of section 80P would not apply to a cooperative bank. Though the assessee argued that it had transactions only with its members and not public, this contention was not accepted by AO. The AO held assessee was not eligible for a deduction u/s 80P(2)(i) of the Act. On appeal, the CIT(A) held that assessee was entitled to exemption u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act.

On appeal, the ITAT held that,

++ one of the main object of assessee society was providing credit facility to its members. Out of substantial sum received as deposits from the members, only small portion were given by assessee as loans to its members. Major part of the funds were parked in FDs. However, it is an admitted position that assessee was bound to give interest to its members on the deposits received by it from them. Therefore, when there were no takers for the money, which assessee as a part of its objects wanted to lend, the only available choice for assessee, in order not to keep the funds idle, was to place it in banks for earning interest. The High Court in the case of CIT v. Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd held that interest income is attributable to carrying on the business of banking and therefore it is liable to be deducted in terms of Section 80P(1) of the Act;

++ the judgement of jurisdictional High Court clearly mentioned that the money meant for lending, remaining surplus, there being no takers, if deposited in banks for earning interest, such interest income would be attributable to the business of banking carried out by the assessee.Facts of the case here fit perfectly well with the facts in the judgment mentioned above. It was therefore, held that assessee was eligible for claiming deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, on the interest earned on the FDs placed by it with banks, this being a part of its business income.

(See 2017-TIOL-1025-ITAT-BANG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.