News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Costly entertainment in GST era

JULY 31, 2017

By Shalini Ranjan, Assistant Manager, Grant Thornton India LLP.

'ENTERTAINMENT', for all practical purposes in today's times, includes various modes of recreation – including, but not limited to; circuses, theatre, celebrity–driven events, sporting extravaganzas (especially money–churners like the IPL and the ISL) etc.

Hence, it is only natural that this vast expansion in what 'entertainment' means to us in today's age of click–button information and broadcasting would also entail significant changes in the treatment of the same from a taxation point of view. Under the erstwhile indirect tax regime,State Governments used to derive the power to levy Entertainment Tax vide List II, Schedule 7 of the Constitution of India. Exhibitions, sports events, amusement parks, theatre etc.were the primary areas that attracted the levy of Entertainment Tax.

Introduction of Entertainment Tax – The backdrop

The practice of levying tax on entertainment and amusement was initiated by the British Government to discourage public gatherings. However, even after independence, when governance changed its hands, a source of revenue was too dear for the Governments to let go of. Thus, levy and collection of Entertainment Tax continued unabated.

The rate of Entertainment Tax varied from 15% to 110%; with the highest rate being levied by the State of Jharkhand. However, the States which levied the said tax did offer major concessions to the screening of movies in respective local languages.

Introduction of GST and the 101st Constitutional Amendment

To make way for uniformity in indirect taxation and to remove various ills plaguing the indirect tax system in India – namely multiple levy of taxes, cascading effect and double taxation; Lists I and II of Schedule 7 of the Constitution of India were amended by way of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. The said Amendment effectively paved the way for Central levies such as Central Excise Duty, Service Tax etc. as well as State levies such as Value Added Tax, Entertainment Tax, and Luxury Tax to be subsumed under GST.

The said Amendment entailed, inter alia ,the substitution to Entry 62 of List II in the manner specified below:

" 62. Taxes on luxuries, including taxes on entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling ."

Prior to amendment

" 62. Taxes on entertainments and amusements to the extent levied and collected by a Panchayat or a Municipality or a Regional Council or a District Council ."

Post amendment

Entertainment Tax: Post–GST perpetuation?

Subsequent to the introduction of GST, all erstwhile Statutes created for the levy and administration of Entertainment Tax by the respective State Governments were repealed; with the respective State GST Acts as well as Rules taking up the said mantle. Consequently, at present, entry to events like sports, exhibitions, amusement facilities, theme parks etc. attracts GST at the maximum imposable rate of 28%.

With the intention of making good the losses suffered by various States as a result of the introduction of GST, the Government enacted the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017;which deals with the levy of a 'compensatory' cess on various goods and services. Section 5(1)(d) of the GST Compensation to States Act takes into consideration the revenue earned by the States from the taxes on luxuries, including taxes on entertainments, amusements, betting and gambling or any other tax levied by the concerned State under the erstwhile entry 62 of List-II (State List) of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution for determining the Cess which may be imposed by a State.

However, it is important to note a small tweaking carried out in Entry 62 vide the 101 st Amendment to the Constitution. The said tweak ensures that the levy of Entertainment Tax is not completely removed; but rather empowers the local authorities to levy the same. Therefore, Entertainment Tax (if) levied by local authorities, continues to thrive under GST.

For instance, the State of Haryana levied Entertainment Tax via the Punjab Entertainments Duty Act, 1955. The Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in line with Constitutional Amendment, repealed the Punjab Entertainments Duty Act, 1955 via Section 174, leading to no separate levy of Entertainment Tax by the State under GST.

Nevertheless, exercising the powers conferred under the Constitution of India;the Haryana Cabinet has approved the Haryana Municipal Entertainment Duty Bill, 2017, wherein 'Entertainment Duty' shall be collected by urban municipal bodies. It is important to note that this levy and collection shall be over and above the GST paid on events for entertainment.

It appears that Haryana is not the sole State heading towards levy of Entertainment Duty under GST, but there are others which have and may follow suit.

The action taken by the State of Haryana or by any other State shall be well within four corners of Law since the power to levy Entertainment Tax has been given to local authorities. In a situation wherein States are levying Compensation Cess in lieu of revenue loss due to inclusion of taxes like luxury, entertainment, and entry into GST, a separate levy such as Entertainment Tax is nothing but specially engineered way for the States to levy an additional tax.

If the above is not curtailed, this shall effectively defeat the very objective behind the introduction of GST.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout - Are We Ready? - Episode 2 (Concluded)

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Extremely Informative Article

Ma'am
The article is extremely informative and well-written. Entertainment Tax seldom comes to the forefront when we discuss indirect taxation, especially in context of the recently-introduced GST provisions.
Your keen observation has highlighted that the imposition of some taxes may still propagate the dreaded system of 'multiplicity of taxes' even under GST. Let's hope some corrective action is undertaken.

Posted by PwC
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.