News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Supplies to SEZ Units - no restrictions for exemption under GST

AUGUST 04, 2017

By S Sivakumar, LL.B., FCA, FCS, ACSI, MBA, Advocate

IN what could be seen as a major relief to SEZ Developers and SEZ Units, the restrictions associated with exemptions that were prevalent under the service tax law are no longer there. As we know, the exemption from the levy of service tax, on services rendered to SEZ Units and SEZ Developers was governed by Notification No, 12/2013-ST dated July 1, 2013 subject, interalia , to the condition that the SEZ Developer or the SEZ Unit furnished a declaration in Form A-1, duly approved by the Specified Officer of the SEZ which, on submission, was approved by the jurisdictional Asst /Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, in Form A-2. One fundamental requirement for the ab-initio exemption was that, the specified services should be used exclusively for the authorised operations of the SEZ Developer or the SEZ Unit.

In fact, it used to be a procedural nightmare for SEZ Developers and SEZ Units to obtain the approval for the ab-initio exemption, in Form A-2, as in many cases, the Service Tax Department used to sit in judgement on granting approval and used to reject the request for the exemption, on the basis that the input services were not directly related to the output service of the SEZ Unit or that, these services were not rendered in the SEZ area.

With the advent of the GST regime, Notification No. 12/2013-ST dated July 1, 2013 will have no applicability. In the absence of a similar notification under GST, it would seem that, the exemption from levy of tax under GST, in respect of zero rated supplies to SEZ Developers and SEZ Units is available, sans any approval from the Department and without the need for these services to be rendered inside the SEZ area.

Thus, a SEZ Unit would be entitled to ask its suppliers to desist from levying tax under GST, in respect of supplies such as accommodation services in a Hotel outside the SEZ area for stay of the SEZ Unit's visiting customers, supply of food by the Hotel in respect of a party hosted by the SEZ Unit for its employees, etc. It would not have been possible for the SEZ Unit to obtain approval from the Service Tax Department in Form A-2 for these supplies, under the service tax law. Thus, one can see that, SEZ Developers and SEZ Units would significantly gain under the GST regime, as the exemption that is made available to them would seemingly cover allinward supplies, irrespective of whether or not such supplies are linked to their authorized operations. So long as the supplies are effected to the SEZ Developer and SEZ Units, the ab-initio exemption from levy of tax under GST cannot be denied, in my view, in the absence of a notification similar to Notification No. 12/2013, referred to above.

Of course…..the registered person who effects taxable supplies to SEZ Developers and SEZ Units would be required to execute the requisite bond or LUT, in terms of Notification No. 16/2017-CT read with Circular No. 4/4/2017, both dated 7-7-2017.

Be that as it may….registered taxable persons who effect supplies to SEZ Developers and SEZ Units would, however, be advised that they could face issues, if they claim refund of the ITC attributable to the zero rated supplies effected to the SEZ Developer or the SEZ Unit.

Rule 89 of the CGST Rules, 2017 is reproduced below…

89. Application for refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount.

(1) Any person, except the persons covered under notification issued under section 55, claiming refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him, other than refund of integrated tax paid on goods exported out of India, may file an application electronically in FORM GST RFD-01 through the common portal, either directly or through a Facilitation Centre notified by the Commissioner:

Provided that any claim for refund relating to balance in the electronic cash ledger in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (6) of section 49 may be made through the return furnished for the relevant tax period in FORM GSTR-3 or FORM GSTR-4 or FORM GSTR-7, as the case may be:

Provided further that in respect of supplies to a Special Economic Zone unit or a Special Economic Zone developer, the application for refund shall be filed by the –

(a) supplier of goods after such goods have been admitted in full in the Special Economic Zone for authorised operations, as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone;

(b) supplier of services along with such evidence regarding receipt of services for authorised operations as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone:

Consequently, if the registered taxable person effecting taxable supplies to the SEZ Developer or the SEZ Unit is in a position to utilize the ITC related to his billings on SEZ Developers or Units, there would be no need to pay tax under GST on his invoices raised on the SEZ Developer or SEZ Unit. However, if such registered taxable person wants so claim refund of the ITC related to his billings on the SEZ Developers or Units, he would have to insist that his invoices (raised without charging tax) are endorsed by the specified officer of the SEZ, which should be made a pre-condition for not charging taxes under GST.

GST: Ek Desh Ek Kar | Episode 1

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout - Are We Ready? - Episode 2 (Concluded)

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Zero rated supply to SEZ units or its developers

Apropos your views about the taxability of services provided by hotel to the visiting persons of SEZ unit or hosting a recreational parties by SEZ in a hotel. As per the understanding, it appears that the services provided outside SEZ by a hotel, being the performance based service, the place of supply of such services will be the place of location of hotel or restaurant. The place of supply byhotel or restaurant being outside the SEZ, does not appear to be provided in the SEZ and I doubt there will be no exemption for such services. The author may please examine it again- Arvind

Posted by cestat cestat
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.