News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Woes of EOUs in GST Regime

AUGUST 07, 2017

By Rajat Dosi, Partner, RSA Legal Solutions

IT prima facie appears that the entire manner of implementation of the new GST regime in India has overall been very unfair to the several EOUs operating in the country as of now. In the last week of June, when the GST was just a week away, there was no clarity as far as operation of EOUs was concerned. All the EOUs in the country were not even aware of whether or not the erstwhile exemptions from customs and central excise on import and domestic procurement will continue in the GST regime in the form of exemption from payment of applicable GST (CGST, SGST or IGST, as the case may be). When this sort of basic clarity was not provided by the Government, expecting procedural clarity was a far cry.

The basic premise was made known to them, just before the GST curtains were raised, by putting FAQs on the DGFT website. At the last minute, they were told that they will be treated at par with the DTA supplier under the GST regime, and no GST exemption will be available to them. This literally created a near chaos among these EOUs.

Further, these FAQs also did more harm than clarifying the various aspects of the EOU scheme, which were going to change due to the implementation of the GST regime. This was followed by amendments in the various customs and excise notification(s), and one more / revised FAQs by the DGFT office (here I completely fail to understand the relevance of issuing FAQs as a statutory document to provide the manner of operation of EOUs in the interim till the revised FTP is issued by the DGFT office in September, 2017).

Till date, despite the above, the position is far from being clear. The premise which is coming out of the above amendments in the customs and excise notifications and the FAQs issued by the DGFT office is riddled with a number of ambiguities and needs immediate attention of the Government, for them to clarify for the benefit of the several EOUs operating in the country. This article briefly highlights few such issues, in the below paragraphs, faced currently by the EOUs.

DTA Clearance – Interest on BCD

Notification 52/2003-Cus dated 31.03.2003 provides exemption from payment of BCD, CVD and SAD (under the customs law, as existed prior to the GST implementation), on import of goods into India by the EOUs. On GST implementation, this notification has been amended vide Notification No. 59/2017-Cus dated 30.06.2017. A number of changes have been made vide this notification. One such change is by way of addition of the following para in the original customs notification (only relevant portion is reproduced):

" 3. Notwithstanding anything contained in this notification, the exemption from the whole of duty of Customs leviable thereon under First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), shall not apply to inputs which on importation into India or procurement, are used for the purpose of manufacture of finished goods or services and such finished goods and services, are supplied in Domestic Tariff Area … "

Thus, under the GST regime, on DTA clearance of goods by an EOU, the BCD benefit availed by such EOU on inputs required for manufacture of finished products cleared in DTA, will have to be surrendered at the time of such DTA clearance. The language employed ( BCD exemption shall not apply ) seems to suggest that BCD will have to be reversed along with interest(payable from the date of import till the date of payment of duty) on DTA clearance. Instead of the language currently employed, if the provision would have provided for simple payment of BCD on DTA clearance, interest liability would not have been hoisted on such DTA clearance. However, the language used seems to suggest that BCD will have to be paid along with interest.

In this regard, the amending notification also added the following explanation in the original notification (relevant portion reproduced):

"Explanation.- For the purpose of this paragraph, on payment of whole of duty of Customs leviable thereon under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 availed as exemption, under this notification, on the inputs utilised for the purpose of manufacture of finished goods, before clearance of such finished goods or services on payment of applicable, Goods and Service Tax leviable thereon, in Domestic Tariff Area or as are in stock at the time of exit, it shall be treated as if no exemption was availed under this notification ."

From the language of the above explanation, when it states that it will be treated that no exemption was availed, one view which emerges is that no interest will be payable on BCD on DTA clearance by EOUs, despite the above stated main provision. But if this was the intention behind this explanation, the employment of this confusing language to state a simple thing that no interest will be payable, is completely unwarranted and something to be avoided. Therefore, a suitable clarification to this effect will really be helpful to the EOUs.

Manner of Calculation of BCD on DTA clearance

As stated above, on DTA clearance now,EOUs are required to surrender BCD exemption availed on inputs utilized in manufacture of such finished goods cleared in DTA. This provision has created nightmares in the life of EOUs across the country. The manner of calculation has not been specified anywhere.

The DGFT FAQs simply state that the BCD is to be calculated as per the SION or norms fixed by Norms Committee of DGFT(where no SION is fixed). This clarification adds to the problem of EOUs. Majority of EOUs are not even aware of SION and have not got their norms fixed from the DGFT office, in cases wherein their products are not covered by SION.

Further, in this itself there are a lot of other problems, which have been briefly highlighted below:

1. How the value of inputs is to be determined, as imports happen on a continuous basis and the value in many cases fluctuates (basis international demand and supply or change in foreign supplier)? – Do we apply FIFO method or any other method in this regard;

2. There may be a situation wherein even the rate of BCD changes, therein also the above issue will arise;

3. Further, if interest is applicable the above issue will arise even therein;

4. If the same inputs are procured domestically as well as imported into India. In such situation, how to determine whether imported inputs have been used or input procured domestically have been used, in manufacture of goods cleared in DTA. Whether or not there is a requirement to pay BCD on DTA clearance will be a very pertinent question in such situation?;

5. Even payment of customs duty will be a problem. There is no online mechanism for payment of customs duty. The same will have to be done on the port of importation by way of TR-6 Challan. This will have its own share of practical problems.

For resolving this issue, I have a suggestion that the drawback rates (pertaining to the customs portion) may be adopted and EOUs be required to pay BCD at such rates . This thumb rule, if implemented, will take care of all the above rigors and save the EOU from much un-necessary trouble of calculating their BCD liability on DTA clearance every time they clear goods in DTA. An exception in this may be carved out for those EOUs who have not used any imported inputs, for manufacture of goods cleared in DTA.

I hope the Board issues suitable clarifications for the above highlighted issues at the earliest. Further, it would be most helpful if the Ministry of Commerce and Industry also puts the revised FTP in public domain before its actual implementation for trade and industry to make its suggestions (just like the model GST law which was put in public domain before implementation).

GST: Ek Desh Ek Kar | Episode 1

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout - Are We Ready? - Episode 2 (Concluded)

GST Roll-Out - Are we ready? - Episode 1

GST Rollout | Episode 2 | simply inTAXicating

GST Rollout | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.