News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Treading GST Path - XXIX -Transitional credit for builders

AUGUST 18, 2017


By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

A builder would be entitled for following types of transitional credits.

- If the builder was availing VAT credit and paying VAT, the closing balance of VAT credit as per the last VAT return would be allowed to be carried forward under Section 140 (1) of the SGST Acts.

- If the builder was availing cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on input services, the closing balance of Cenvat Credit as per the last ST 3 return would be allowed to be carried forward under section 140 (1) of the CGST Act.

- If the builder was not availing credit of VAT paid on inputs (having opted to pay VAT under compounding scheme), he would be entitled to avail credit of VAT paid on inputs lying in stock and contained in work in progress and finished goods under section 140 (3) of the SGST Acts. For a builder, the flats / building being constructed by him is not capital asset, but only stock in trade and hence credit would be admissible for the inputs contained in such constructed / semi-finished buildings, subject to other conditions.

- As the builder would not have availed cenvat credit of the Excise duty paid on inputs, he would be entitled to avail credit of Central Excise duties paid on inputs lying in stock and contained in work in progress and finished goods under section 140 (3) of the CGST Act.

Let us take a case, where a builder is constructing a residential complex comprising of 50 flats, out of which 10 are sold and the remaining are yet to be sold. For the flats already sold, amounts equal to the work completion stage have been realised prior to GST and appropriate earlier taxes have been paid. Let us assume that 25 % of the construction is complete as on 01.07.2017 and also billed. Let us assume that the builder was not taking any credit of the VAT /CE duty paid on inputs under the earlier law.

Transitional credit under Section 140 (3) is available only in respect of the inputs purchased in the last one year, i.e. on or after 01.07.2016.

Let us assume the following data with respect to one important input, viz., cement.

S.No.

Details

Quantity

Amount

1

Cement purchased from 01.07.2016to 30.06.2017 @ Rs.40 per KG

30000 KG

Rs.12,00,000

2

Cement lying in stock as on 30.06.2017

5000 KG

RS.2,00,000

3

Total ED on purchase of 30000 KG@ 12.5 %

 

Rs.1,50,000

4

ED on stock of cement as on 30.06.2017 5000 KG @ 12.5 %

 

Rs.25,000

5

Total VAT on purchase of 30000 KG @ 14.5 % on value + ED

 

Rs.1,95,750

6

VAT on stock of cement as on 30.06.2017 5000 KG @ 14.5 %

 

Rs.32,625

It may be observed that credit of Rs.25,000 as Excise duty and Rs.32,625 as VAT pertaining to the stock of 5000 KG of cement available on 30.06.2017, can be availed as transitional credit.

Now the quantum of credit attributable to the stock of cement contained in the work in progress, supported by less than one year old invoices has to be identified. It may be observed that as on 01.07.2016 there could have been opening balance of cement, which would have also been used during the period from 01.07.2016 to 30.06.2017. The opening stock of cement as on 01.07.2016 plus purchases from 01.07.2016 to 30.06.2017 minus closing stock of cement as on 30.06.2017 would give the quantum of cement consumed during the period from 01.07.2016 to 30.06.2017 and contained in the work in progress. Out of this, there would be no transitional credit pertaining to the opening stock as on 01.07.2016, as the same would be more than one year old and hence the same can be ignored. From out of 30000 KG of cement purchased in the last one year from 01.07.2016, 25000 KG has been used and contained in the work in progress.

In respect of the 40 flats which are yet to be sold, the entire sale proceeds in future would be subjected to GST. In respect of the 10 flats already sold, for the amount to be received from the buyers on or after 01.07.2017, appropriate GST would be paid and to this extent, ITC is also entitled.

It may be noted that 25000 KG of cement has been used in the construction of 50 flats in the last one year (25 % construction complete), out of which 10 flats are sold and to the extent of completion, amounts have also been received from the customers and taxes have been paid under earlier law, where no credit was admissible. So, out of the 25000 KGs of cement, which is contained in work in progress, credit would be admissible only in respect of 40 flats,

40

25000 KGs X --------- = 20,000 Kgs
50

ED Attributable to 20,000 Kgs = 20000 * Rs.40 * 12.5 % = Rs. 1,00,000

VAT attributable to 20,000 Kgs = (20000 * Rs.40 + ED) * 14.5 % = Rs.1,30,500

ITC for inputs lying in stock = Rs.25000 (ED) + 32,625 (VAT) = 57,625

ITC for inputs contained in WIP = Rs.1,00,000 (ED) + Rs.1,30,500 (VAT) = Rs.2,30,500

The above method of computation of transitional credit has to be done for each and every raw material, for which credit needs to be taken. Further, in a practical situation, the level of completion of individual flats and the amount so far received from the respective buyers would also vary from case to case, making the exercise of quantifying transitional credit attributable to inputs contained in work in progress and finished goods very complex.

Another peculiar situation in the construction industry is that the builder would have sub contracted the entire work to a sub contractor and the sub contractor would procure all materials. In such case, entitlement for any transitional credit in respect of inputs in stock should be determined only in the hands of the contractor. To the extent of work completed, the sub contractor would have already claimed consideration from the builder and thus, if the work done upto 30.06.2017 has already been billed by the sub contractor, there would be no work in progress in the hands of the sub contractor. The sub contractor would be entitled to avail transitional credit only for the stock of inputs lying as such with him.

In the hands of the builder, the unsold flats would be his work in progress and in respect of the materials contained in such work in progress, to the extent of last one year purchases, though ITC is legally entitled, the same can neither be availed by the sub contractor (as it is not a work in progress for him as he had already billed for the completed work on the builder) nor by the builder (as he would not be in possession of any duty paying documents in his name as the purchases are made by the sub contractor).

GST Rollout - 6 Weeks After | simply inTAXicating

GST: Ek Desh Ek Kar | Episode 1

GST Rollout - One Week After | simply inTAXicating

Also See : TIOL TUBE Videos on GST

 

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Transitional Credit

The author has analysed the proviso as it is. But the construction which is considered under works contract is only eligible for ITC. The works contract is defined as a service and not goods. In this scenario how one can consider which is work in progress and which portion is Finished goods. Whatever utilized are all provided for the service. Further in any building if one portion is certififed for occupation then the entire building would be considered as immovable property. How the credit would be available for the balance portion. All these issues are not clear. Hope the author clarifies these issues.

R Vaidyanathan
Consultant - Indirect Taxation
Bangalore

Posted by Ramadoss Vaidyanathan
 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.