News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
CX - As lessee had not transferred business to appellant, provision of Rule 10 of CCR, 2004 not complied with - credit rightly denied: CESTAT

By TIOLNews Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 04, 2017: M/s MOUND Trading Co. Pvt. Limited had obtained the premises in question on lease basis and also obtained the capital goods from M/s Parle Products Pvt. Limited on lease basis.

The lessor gave an undertaking that M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited is their job worker and they will use the capital goods and will be entitled to take cenvat credit on capital goods and inputs.

As M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited did not find it viable to continue, they discontinued their business and surrendered the registration certificate. Since they were a job worker of M/s Parle Products Pvt. Limited, the premises were taken over by M/s Parle Products Pvt. Limited and cenvat credit on capital goodsetc. was availed.

SCN was issued to deny cenvat credit alleging that the appellant had contravened the provisions of Rule 10 of CCR, 2004.

The demand was confirmed and, therefore, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submittedby the appellant that as M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited was the lessee, therefore, they are the owner of the goods and appellant were actual user of the goods;that appellant had undertaken all the assets and liabilities of M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited , therefore, they have correctly availed cenvat credit.

The AR informed the Bench that M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited had surrendered their registration certificate and in these circumstances, the appellant is not entitled to avail cenvat credit.

In the letter, it is mentioned -

"This has reference to our letter dated 18/07/08 wherein we have requested to you that we did not want to carry on our manufacturing activity after 31st July, 2008. In other words we will keep continue our manufacturing activity upto 31st July 2008. Now we would like to inform you that due to some packing material i.e. lying in stock like wrapper that cannot be utilised or sale because of printing of company name on the wrapper. This wrapper cannot be utilised by owner company. It's a legal bounding of P.F.A. so we will utilise this wrapper and will surrender our Registration certificate on date 05/08/08 and we will submit original Registration certificate on our before 05/08/08.

As we know on or after 05/08/08 M/S PARLE BISCUITS PVT. LTD., NEEMRANA want to carryon it's manufacturing activity in the same premises.

If we are to observe any other formality in this regard please advise us. Your guidance is most welcome.

This is for your kind information please."

The Bench extracted the contents of rule 10 of CCR, 2004 and observed -

++ As per the said Rule if a manufacturer shifts his factory to another site, the factory is transferred on account of change in ownership or on account of sale, merger, amalgamation, lease or transfer of the factory to a joint venture, in that circumstances, cenvat credit can be transferred.

++ As M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited has not transferred their business to M/s Parle Biscuits Pvt. Limited , in that circumstances, the provision of Rule 10 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 have not been complied with. Therefore, the appellant is not entitled to avail cenvat credit on work in process, on capital goods and inputs of M/s Mound Trading Co. Pvt. Limited .

Holding that there is no infirmity in the impugned order, the same was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.

(See 2017-TIOL-3580-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.