News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - Claim of wrong presumption regarding status of payee will not earn reprieve for payer for default committed in withholding tax liability: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI , MAR 20, 2018: THE issue is - Whether mere presumption regarding status of Noida Authority as "Local Authority" will absolve payer from his negligence in not withholding TDS on payment of lease rent to Noida Authority. NO IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee i.e., NOIDA SEZ Authority, had made payment of lease rent to Noida Authority during the relevant year, on which no TDS was deducted u/s 194-I. The AO therefore passed orders u/s 201(1) / 201(1A) for non-deduction of tax and also initiated the penalty proceedings. The assessee submitted before A.O. the details with explanatory note that TDS deduction was not applicable in the case of Noida Authority. The AO was however of the view that "Noida Authority was not exempt u/s 10(20) as it was not Local Authority." The AO therefore, held that assessee had no reasonable cause for non-deduction of TDS on the payments of lease rent paid to Noida Authority. He also levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for all A.Ys vide separate orders.

On appeal, the FAA noted that there was no dispute regarding not deduction of tax on the amounts paid as lease rent to Noida Authority. In response, the assessee submitted that this lapse happened because of the claim of Noida Authority that it was not liable for deduction of tax at source. The FAA did not accept this contention because the deductee could not influence the deductor in not following the law.

Tribunal held that,

++ the provision of Section 273B provides that penalty need not be imposed on the person or the assessee as the case may be for failure to deduct TDS, if the assessee proves that there was a reasonable cause for the said failure. The AO in the order u/s 201(1) / 201(1A), specifically noted the explanation of assessee in which it was submitted by assessee that assessee requested the Noida Authority to clarify their position whether their income is exempt, but, no reply have been received from them. Prior to it, the Writ Petition of Noida Authority was dismissed by Allahabad High Court. The AO therefore rejected the contention of assessee and passed the order for recovery of the short deduction with interest. The assessee in the penalty proceedings claimed that income of the Noida Authority exempt u/s 10(20), which fact was also not proved by the assessee because it was incorrect. Therefore, the assessee had been negligent in not deducting TDS on lease rent paid to Noida Authority without any justification. Since assessee failed to prove its bonafide through any relevant and cogent evidence, therefore, assessee cannot take benefit of Section 273B.

(See 2018-TIOL-402-ITAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.