News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
VAT - Assessee's failure to object to pre-assessment notices, will not relinquish his right to personal hearing: HC

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, APRIL 14, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH IS - Whether failure to submit objection to the pre-assessment notices, by itself gives a right to the AO to deny opportunity of personal hearing. NO IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The Assessee is a manufacturer and trader of cotton yarn and waste cotton. Consequent to the completion of its assessment on the basis of the returns submitted by it, the premises of assessee was inspected by the Enforcement Wing officials, wherein certain incriminating materials were found, on basis of which the Officers arrived at a factual conclusion that assessee had not arrived at reversal of credit on ITC claim corresponding to exempted sale and sale on consignment basis. The Enforcement Wing officials therefore issued notice to the assessee to appear before them and show cause as to why the assessment should not be re-opened. In response, the assessee submitted its explanation, which was considered by Enforcement Wing and then forwarded to the ACCT for appropriate action in accordance with the provisions of the TNVAT Act. Consequent to the same, the ACCT issued pre-assessment notices. Since there was no response from the assessee thereafter, the ACCT completed the assessment ex parte.

High Court held that,

++ as far as ex parte assessment is concerned, the ACCT had initiated action for re-opening only on account of the report submitted by the Enforcement Wing. The Enforcement Wing forwarded the incriminating documents stated to have been seized from the premises of assessee along with the explanation given by assessee. Even though the ACCT considered the incriminating documents and the notices issued by the Enforcement Wing before issuing assessment notices, the fact remains that the explanation given by assessee on two occasions to the Enforcement Wing though available on file were overlooked by the AO. It is true that the assessee has not given any reply subsequent to the pre-assessment notices. However, that would not give a right to the ACCT to resort to the process of ex parte assessment in view of the explanation given by assessee to the Enforcement Wing, which is part of records. Therefore, the failure to consider the objections received by the Enforcement Wing and forwarded by them to the ACCT would vitiate the assessment orders;

++ as far as denial of personal hearing is concerned, the ACCT has denied the assessee opportunity of hearing only on the ground that objection was not given to the pre-assessment notices. Even if objection was not given, still the assessing authority was expected to post the matter for hearing by issuing notice to the assessee.

(See 2018-TIOL-688-HC-MAD-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.