News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - For claiming deduction u/s 80IA(4), infrastructure development agreement executed by nodal agency of State Govt should be treated to have been entered by State itself: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, MAY 08, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT IS - Whether infrastructure development projects undertaken by assessee with nodal agency incorporated by the State Government is entitled for deduction 80IA(4) of the Act. YES IS THE VERDICT.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company, engaged in implementing infrastructure development projects, had filed return for relevant AY. The assessee had claimed deduction 80IA(4) of the Act. During assessment AO noted that assessee had undertaken road development project, in pursuance of an agreement with Gujarat State Road Development Corporation ('GSRDC'). The Assessee contended that the GSRDC was performing all the functions of the State Government and therefore the concession agreement executed by GSRDC should be treated to have been entered into by the State Government. The AO however did not accept such contention and rejected the assessee's claim of deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act. On appeal, CIT(A) granted deduction to assessee. On further appeal, Tribunal upheld the order of CIT(A).

High Court held that,

++ GSRDC was a nodal agency constituted by the State Government for the purpose of executing road development projects through private participation and was a Government agency. The road widening project was cleared by the Government, land for such purpose was allotted by the Government. The concession agreement which GSRDC executed was approved by the Government. It was under the Government Resolution that the assessee would collect toll upon completion of such project. Upon the completion of the project period, the entire infrastructure so developed would vest in the Government. Signatory to the applicant may be GSRDC for all practical purposes and in essence, it was the agreement between the assessee and the State Government. Condition (b) of subsection (4) of section 80IA requires the assessee to have entered into agreement with the Central Government or a State Government or a local authority or any other statutory authority. However, rigid interpretation of this provision as canvassed by the Revenue would only result into the assessees involved in genuine infrastructure development projects for and on behalf of the Government or local authorities would be denied the deduction merely on the ground that the State Government had created a nodal agency for working out the finer details and nittygritty of such infrastructure development. The purpose of creating such nodal agencies as well as the legislative intent of granting deduction to the assessee engaged in developing, maintaining or operating any infrastructure projects for Central or State Government or local or statutory authorities would frustrate.

(See 2018-TIOL-851-HC-AHM-IT)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: 80 IA 4 to road developer

what will happen to explanation now of contractor vs developer now can it be said that all road contractors are developers?

Posted by PM Maharishi
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.