News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
CX - No justification to deny CENVAT credit on capital goods merely because they are installed in sister Unit: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, JUNE 26, 2018: THE assessee installed boiler and parts thereof in Unit II but availed CENVAT credit in their Unit no. I. The electricity generated in Unit II was exclusively used in their Unit I.

Holding the credit taken in Unit I as inadmissible, the demand was confirmed with penalty and interest.

Having failed before the Commissioner(A), the appellant is before the CESTAT and informs that subsequent to the demand notice, on application made by them, they received centralized registration for both the units on 26th April 2013.

Inasmuch as since whatever electricity generated in their Unit II had been captively consumed in their Unit I, credit was rightly taken on the capital goods viz. boiler and parts.

The appellant relied on the decision in OPG Metals Pvt. Ltd. - 2016-TIOL-1842-CESTAT-MAD wherein in similar facts and circumstances the credit was allowed.

The CESTAT extracted the cited decision and by following the same, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals.

(See 2018-TIOL-1949-CESTAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.