News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - No taxpayer can be prevented from netting off interest received on income tax refund, against interest payable on delayed deposit of tax, same being tax neutral exercise: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 19, 2018: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether a taxpayer cannot be prevented from netting off interest received on income tax refund against interest payable on delayed deposit of tax, as the same does not result in any loss to I-T Department. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee company, engaged in the business of manufacturing & sale of pharmaceutical products, had e-filed its return declaring total income of Rs.252,00,29,460/- as per the normal provisions and a 'book profit' of Rs.305,22,12,660/- as per the provisions of Sec.115JB. The case of assessee was then taken up for scrutiny, wherein the AO noticed that assessee company was in receipt of interest on income tax refunds amounting to Rs.2,64,12,688/- for various assessment years, and it had claimed set off of the same against the interest of Rs.3,67,73,753/- that was paid to the Income tax Department for late payment of tax for various years. However, the claim for set off was declined by AO for the reason that interest paid did not have a nexus with the interest received by assessee. On appeal, the assessee's claim for setting off of interest income was allowed.

Tribunal held that,

++ it is found that the issue that an assessee is well within his right to set off the interest received on the income tax refund against the interest paid on the taxes to the income tax department, is squarely covered by the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in the case of DIT Vs. Bank of America NT & SA [ITA No. 177 of 2012, dated July 03, 2014], wherein it was observed that: "....The Tribunal found that the assessee Bank received interest on refund of taxes paid. It also paid interest on the taxes which were payable. The Assessee sought to set off the interest paid against the interest received and offered the net interest received to tax. Now, the Tribunal has opined that when the exercise carried out by assessee does not result in loss of revenue, there could not be any prohibition for the same...." Therefore, being of the considered view that as the issue involved in the appeal is squarely covered by the judgment of Bombay High Court, and therefore, respectfully following the same, the AO is directed to allow the claim of assessee for setting off the interest on income tax refund of Rs. 2,64,12,688/- against the interest of Rs. 3,67,73,753/- paid to the income tax department on late payment of tax for various years.

(See 2018-TIOL-1095-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.