News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
CX - Recovery - Tribunal is not in a position to adjudicate with regards dispute between partners of Company and partners in partnership firm: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JULY 24, 2018: THE appellants are partners in the company/partnership firm and have filed appeals against the recovery proceeding initiated by the department for recovery of dues adjudged against company/partnership firm.

The Bench, at the outset, directed the appellants to make submission with regards to maintainability of the appeals.

The appellant submitted that recovery should have been made from the Company first and then only it should have been from the partners; that, therefore,they are in appeal and the same are maintainable.

It is also submitted that there is no dispute in respect of the amount held recoverable against the company/partnership firm.

The Bench considered the submissions and observed -

"5. …Appeals are directed against the amounts to be recovered from the assessees in which the said appellants were partners at the relevant time. This Tribunal as per the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not in a position to adjudicate with regards the dispute between the partners of the Company and the partners in the partnership firm. Since there is no dispute in respect of any amount adjudged against the appellants, the appeals as such are not maintainable in the first instance and is liable to dismissed and I do so."

The appeals were dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-2253-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.