News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - If consideration of slump sale is to be paid in parts in different AYs, capital gains are to be taxed in the year in which agreement is executed: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, AUG 07, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether if sale consideration of slum sale is to be received in two or more parts in different AYs, the capital gains should be computed on entire sale consideration in the relevant year in which agreement is executed. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling home appliances, had through a slump sale agreement with M/s. Preethi Kitchen Appliances Pvt. Ltd, transferred its division at Thazhambur Road, Navalur Village & Post, Kancheepuram along with plant & machinery, furniture & fixtures, computers, inventories etc. Though the total consideration agreed was Rs 18,31,00,000/-, what was received during the relevant year was only Rs 16,02,00,000/- and the balance sum of Rs. 2,29,00,000/- was received in subsequent FY. Further, assessee had computed capital gains on the sum of Rs.16,02,00,000/- in relevant year and the balance sum of Rs 2,29,00,000/- was offered in the subsequent AY. During assessment, the AO held the date of actual receipt of consideration was irrelevant since the slump sale agreement was entered in relevant year so the capital gains should be computed on one go on entire sale consideration in relevant year only. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld the order of AO.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ what is chargeable to tax is profits or gains arising from the slump sale. Profits or gains arising from a slump sale can be correctly computed only if the total consideration arising to an assessee on account of sale is reckoned. There is no provision which allows the assessee to segregate the consideration as per slump sale agreement in accordance with the year of receipt. Amount of sale consideration was transferred in escrow account. Release of the amount lying in the escrow account is subject to issue of a letter from seller and purchaser to the escrow agent. No doubt, release of the escrow amount, is dependent on satisfaction of various responsibilities undertaken by the assessee in relation to the slump sale. This by itself would not be a reason to hold that consideration for the slump sale was not Rs.18,31,00,000/-. Consideration is clearly mentioned in the slump sale agreement as Rs.18,31,00,000/-. Segregating such consideration to two parts, for computing capital gains in not correct. The ground raised by assessee stands dismissed.

(See 2018-TIOL-1226-ITAT-MAD)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.