News Update

PM to hold roadshow in Puri on MondayViolations of economic sanctions: Criminal penalties come into forceBengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - If additional relief claimed on basis of judicial precedents brings assessed income below returned income, appellate authority has jurisdiction to allow such deduction even if revised return was not filed: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, SEPT 27, 2018: THE ISSUE IS - Whether if additional relief claimed by the assessee on the basis of judicial precedents brings the assessed income below the returned income, an appellate authority has the jurisdiction to allow such deductions whether revised return was filed or not. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee company, engaged in generation of electricity through windmill, had claimed deduction of Rs. 3,05,59,000/- u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in respect of its windmill project. The assessee submitted that the amount of deduction had been arrived after considering the notional brought forward losses and depreciation of the windmill business even though such losses/depreciation had been duly set off against other income generated in the earlier AYs. The assessee accordingly claimed deduction after set off of carry forward notional losses and computed the eligible profit for deduction at Rs.3,05,59,270/-.

The AO however denied the deduction on the ground that the assessee could not have set off the losses of eligible business against the income of the regular business in the earlier year when it intended to claim deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act in the succeeding AYs. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 3,05,59,000/- was made to the total income by denying the claim of deduction.

Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) and filed additional ground seeking claim of deduction of entire profit generated from windmill power project without reducing notional brought forward losses and depreciation. The CIT(A) agreed in principle that the assessee was eligible for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(iv) of the Act of the entire profit from its windmill projects unencumbered and unimpacted by the claims or carry forward of depreciation or losses of the past years prior to 'initial assessment year' as opted by the assessee. The CIT(A) however observed that such additional claim of deduction 80IA(4) on account of wrong set off of notional business loss/depreciation, could be entertained only where the assessee had revised its original return. The CIT(A) accordingly accepted the claim of Rs. 3,05,59,000/- towards deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act as made in the return of income but however declined the additional claim of Rs. 7,35,01,934/- raised by the assessee by way of additional ground that arose due to wrong set off towards notional losses of earlier years.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ the claim made by the assessee in its return of income towards deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act was duly accepted by the CIT(A) at the first appellate stage. The CIT(A) refused his indulgence towards the additional claim arose on account of re-working of deduction in the light of prevailing judicial precedents and CBDT Circular No.1 of 2016 dated 15.02.2016 on the ground that the assessee has failed to file the revised return and consequently the additional relief cannot be entertained as it would have the effect of bringing the assessed income below the returned income. But no merit was found in this contention;

++ the appellate authority is not precluded from adjudicating the additional claims of an assessee regardless of whether the return was revised or not. The Revenue is under duty to assess the true profits of an assessee and cannot take advantage of the ignorance of the assessee on the provisions of the Act. Thus, the action of the CIT(A) to this extent requires to be set aside and additional claim of the assessee amounting to Rs.7,35,01,934/- requires to be entertained. However, in the same vain, it was noticed that the quantification aspects of additional claim flowing from notional set off / carry forward of losses of earlier years from eligible profits has not been examined by the authorities below. Accordingly, it was decided to set aside the issue to the file of the AO for the limited purposes of determination of correct quantum of deduction to be computed without setting off any notional losses of the windmill power project pertaining to the earlier assessment years. The AO shall allow enhanced deduction u/s 80IA(4) of the Act as eligible to assessee in accordance with law regardless of claim made by the assessee in this regard in its return of income.

(See 2018-TIOL-1641-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.