News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - One time licence fee paid for setting up of retail outlet, before commencement of business, is to be capitalized; it is not revenue expenditure: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

VIZAG, OCT 26, 2018: THE Issue is - Whether one time licence fees paid for setting up of a retail outlet, and that too before commencement of business, is to be capitalized and cannot be claimed as revenue expenditure. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee is an individual, owning a rice mill and also carrying on the business of retail outlet of petrol bunk. During the year under consideration, the assessee claimed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards licence fee which was disallowed by AO by holding the same as capital expenditure. It is observed by the AO from the details that the assessee had got a letter of intent for Retail outlet of Reliance petrol which was agreed, accepted and signed by the assessee and paid the sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards signing fee. Since this amount was paid in the financial year 2004-05 but not during the current financial year of 2005-06, the AO held that the expenditure was neither incurred nor accrued in the concerned assessment year, and hence the same was not allowable as revenue expenditure in the year under consideration. The AO also observed that the expenditure was incurred for the purpose of setting up of Retail outlet, therefore, the expenditure was capital in nature. On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the order of AO.

Tribunal held that,

++ the assessee is following the mercantile system of accounting and the assessee has paid the sum of Rs.3 lakhs as a signing fee for the training of the dealers and its staff and supervision and coordination of the construction of the retail outlet. The payment was made to the Reliance Industries in A.Y 2005-06 and the expenditure is related to the setting up of the retail outlet incurred before commencement of the business. When queried, the assessee's counsel submitted that the retail outlet of the Reliance unit was commissioned from Oct 01, 2005, whereas the expenditure was incurred on Aug 07, 2004 and the relevant assessment year was 2005-06, but not the year under consideration. Since the unit was commissioned on Oct 01, 2005 and the expenditure was incurred during the construction period before commencement of the business, the said expenditure cannot be related to the expenditure of the relevant assessment year;

++ the assessee's counsel did not provide details with regard to the dates of training given by the Reliance Industries to dealers and the staff. Similarly, no break up of the expenses incurred for the training & construction related activities were submitted. The signing fee was one time payment which was related to the setting up of construction of Reliance petrol pump unit and the expenditure was incurred prior to the commencement of the business, therefore, the contention of assessee that the expenditure be treated as revenue expenditure for the year under consideration, cannot be accepted. Since the expenditure was incurred before the commencement of business, the expenditure required to be capitalized or the same should be amortized as per section 35D.

(See 2018-TIOL-1931-ITAT-VIZAG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.