News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - Sec 80IA benefits are available to even franchisees of basic telephone service providers although it may only be erecting EPABX System: ITAT Special Bench

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 11, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) which is available to basic Telecom Service Providers is also available to franchisees of such service providers, even if it is only putting EPABX system. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The assessee filed return of income for the relevant AY. The returned income was accepted. Subsequently, notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was issued. On scrutiny of the accounts, the AO observed that the assessee had claimed deduction of Rs. 2,07,91,043/- u/s 80IA of the Act. According to the assessee, it had shown income from telecommunication. It was submitted before the AO that in earlier years also such deduction was claimed by the assessee, it was disallowed by the AO. However, when dispute travelled to the Tribunal deduction was granted to the assessee. The AO observed that right from the AY 1997-98 to 2001-02 such deduction was disallowed to the assessee, though CIT(A) and Tribunal had allowed the deduction to the assessee, but department had not accepted the order of the Tribunal and carried the matter before the Gujarat High Court. The AO did not accept the claim of the assessee, because in earlier year, Department went in appeal before the High Court. Accordingly, the AO disallowed the claim of the assessee. On appeal, CIT(A) passed order in favour of Assessee.

On appeal, Tribunal held that,

++ jurisdictional High Court has adjudicated this issue in favour of the assessee, wherein it has been held that the assessees who are franchisees of BSNL and who have been permitted to install, maintain and operate in dialing EPABX under the franchisees to support the department can be treated to have provided “basic telephone services". This would amount to creation of infrastructure entitling them for deduction under section 80IA. Relying on authoritative pronouncement of the jurisdictional High Court in the assessee's own case, it was viewed that question referred to Bench deserves to be answered in favour of the assessee, and against Revenue;

++ the appeal has also been transferred to the Special Bench. Considering the opinion of Special Bench coupled with ratio laid down by the High Court in assessee's own case, it was held that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IA(4)(ii) of the Act. The CIT(A) has rightly granted the same to the assessee. No merit was found in appeal of the Revenue. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.

(See 2019-TIOL-624-ITAT-AHM-SB)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.