News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - If transfer of capital assets is not finalised, part payment made in a particular AY cannot be subjected to capital gains: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 20, 2019: THE ISSUE IS - Whether without finalization of transfer of capital assets, the capital gains cannot be taxed in the AY in which only part of the sale considerations is made. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case

The individual assessee purchased a two storey residential property in 1999. Consequent to the amendment of D.C regulations, the additional construction became permissible on the land on purchase of TDR. In 2002, the assessee entered into a development agreement and also a supplementary agreement subsequently with one M/s U.S. Magnet Pvt Ltd. As per the agreements, the assessee was entitled to receive certain sum in cash and two flats that were going to be constructed. During the assessment proceedings of relevant AY 2008-09, the AO noticed that the assessee has received allotment letters of flats and took the view that such flats were in exchange of property owned by the assessee. Details of such transaction resulting in capital gain in the relevant to AY was not furnished. Therefore, the AO assessed the value of both flats amounting as LTCG and passed the assessment order u/s 144 r.w.s. 147. The CIT(A) affirmed the order passed by the AO.

On hearing the appeal, the Tribunal held that,

++ the liability to capital gains tax shall arise upon entering development agreement, if the assessee has handed over the possession of property and received part consideration. This was held by the jurisdictional High Court in Chaturbhuj Dwarkadas Kapadia vs. CIT. The copy of occupancy certificate shows that the assessee had handed over the possession as per the development agreement and the construction itself has been completed in the year 2006. All these events have taken place much prior to the FY relevant to AY 2008-09. The assessee has also placed copies of electricity bills to show that he has taken possession of flats in the year 2005 itself. These facts would show that the capital gains liability cannot, in any case, would arise in AY 2008-09. Thus, the capital gains, if any, arising on account of development agreement is not assessable in AY 2008-09. The flats received by the assessee are only a part of total sale consideration receivable by the assessee as per the development agreement. There cannot be any dispute that the capital gains liability shall arise upon completion of transfer of capital asset. Hence, the assessee cannot postpone the capital gains tax liability on account of delay in receipt of sale consideration and on the very same criteria, the AO cannot bring capital gains to taxation in the year of receipt of part of sale consideration. Accordingly the Revenue was not justified in placing reliance on the allotment letter given by the developer to the assessee. Accordingly, CIT(A) order is set aside.

(See 2019-TIOL-653-ITAT-MUM)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.