News Update

Bengaluru Customs nabs 4 pax with gold powder worth Rs 1.96 CroreKejriwal’s assistant put in police custody for 5 days in Swati Maliwal caseAllahabad HC upholds decision to dismiss judicial officer demanding dowryNawaz Sharif alleges former Chief Justice plotted to oust him as PM in 2017Heavy downpours claim 50 lives in Central AfghanistanSoaring funeral costs compelling people to let go bodies unclaimed in Canada9 pilgrims burnt to death as bus catches fire near Nuh in HaryanaSpain denies dock permission to Indian ship carrying arms to Israel12 Unicorns, over 125 startups commit to onboarding ONDCBEML secures Rs 250 crore order from Northern Coal FieldsBharat Parv celebration takes centerstage at Cannes Film FestivalSteel industry should work towards reducing emissions: Steel SecretaryI-T - Additions framed on account of unexplained cash credit & unexplained money, are not tenable where cash deposits & withdrawals were of personal funds & were done through banking channels: ITATUS says not too many vibrant democracies in the world than IndiaI-T - Benefit of section 11(2) can not be denied merely on reasoning that form 10 is filed belatedly: ITATSwati Maliwal case takes new turn with Kejriwal’s assistant Bibhav Kumar filing FIR against herI-T- Unexplained money - Additions sustained as assessee unable to provide proper explanation for amount withdrawn & subsequently deposited into same bank account: ITATIndia says Chabahar Port to benefit Central Asia and AfghanistanRussia seizes Italy’s UniCredit assets worth USD 463 mnCus - Order re-determining transaction value based on CRCL test report is not correct & hence unsustainable: CESTATPutin says NO to Macron’s call for ceasefire in Ukraine during OlympicsCus - If price is not sole consideration for sale, then transaction value can be rejected under Rule 8 of Export Valuation Rules & then must be redetermined sequentially through Rules 4 to 6: CESTATSC upholds ICAI rules capping number of audits per year
 
I-T - Revenue is not permitted to make additions based on unrelated incriminating materials found during course of search, if no assessments are pending on date of search: ITAT

 

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, MAR 22, 2019: THE ISSUE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IS - Whether once assessments stood concluded on the date of search and are not pending consideration, then no adjustment to returned income is permitted u/s 153A in absence of incriminating material. YES IS THE ANSWER.

Facts of the case:

The assessee, an individual, had preferred present appeals challenging the jurisdiction usurped by the AO u/s 153A towards additions/disallowances made in the consequent assessment proceedings owing to search operations. The counsel for assessee submitted that the additions/disallowances made in both the appeals had no rational connection or live link with material found in the course of search action carried out u/s 132 in Sewani Group cases including assessee. The AR submitted that in pursuance of a notice u/s 153A for these assessment years in appeals, the assessment was inter alia completed for AYs 2008-09 & 2009-10. The assessment order was framed making certain additions and disallowances on re-appreciation of facts already disclosed/available with the department prior to search. It was further vehemently asserted that the adjustments made in the search assessments were possibly subject matter of regular assessment and did not resonate with the scheme of search assessment u/s 153A de hors reference to any incriminating material in this regard. The AR further emphasized that both these assessments stood concluded on the date of search and were not pending for assessment and hence in the absence of incriminating material, no adjustment in the returned income was permissible u/s 153A.

Tribunal held:

++ the first and foremost controversy that arises for adjudication is on the scope and ambit of assessment proceedings u/s 153A. The case propounded on behalf of the assessee that additions/disallowances made in Section 153A proceedings has no rational connection with incriminating material, if any, found as a result of search remains undisputed. It is also not dispute that assessment pertaining to the assessment years in question viz. AYs. 2008-09 & 2009-10 stood concluded either u/s 143(1) or u/s .143(3) and were not pending at the time of search. In the backdrop of these facts, it is straightway noticed that the scope of assessment u/s 153A in respect of completed assessment is circumscribed by the condition that the additions/disallowances must have some bearing with the incriminating material detected in the course of search. The scope of assessment u/s 153A in respect of concluded assessment is thus narrower in its sweep as held in long line of judicial precedents including the decision rendered by the Gujarat High Court in Devangi case. Thus, in the absence of any connection with the incriminating material, the additions/disallowances in respect of concluded assessments are not permissible in law.

(See 2019-TIOL-659-ITAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.