News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
Why this haste to enforce E-Waste Rules?

 

APRIL 19, 2023

By Anshul Mittal, Partner at RSA Legal Solutions

THE E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, which came into effect from 1st April 2023, require producers of electronic and electrical equipment (EEE) to register with CPCB on the EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) Portal. However, the portal is under upgradation and is expected to be operationalized only by 30th April 2023.

The CPCB has issued a letter to the Joint Secretary of the Custom department dated 13th April, 2023, requesting the release of imported consignments of producers of 85 EEE items (ITEW 17 to ITEW 27, CEEW 6 to CEEW 19, LSEEW 1 to LSEEW 34, EETW 1 to EETW 8, TLSEW 1 to TLSEW 6, MDW 1 to MDW 10 and LIW 1 to LIW 2) after taking an undertaking from the Producers (which includes Importers) as defined in the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022. The undertaking should be submitted at the email id (ewaste2.cpcb@gov.in) and the producers should also submit the computerized and online generated EPR Registration Certificate from the online portal concerned of CPCB not later than one month from the date of submission of the undertaking.

Despite the government's best efforts, the system is not yet online and neither is there any clarity on how the portal will work nor have any guidelines been issued. The government has not even provided a Q&A session to address the concerns of the industry. Despite all these limitations, the government is asking for compliance from the industry within one month of undertaking. The haste in implementing these rules without providing adequate infrastructure and guidelines is questionable.

The government should have provided more time and clarity to the producers before enforcing the rules. This would have given the industry time to prepare and would have enabled them to comply with the rules without any difficulties. The government should also provide detailed guidelines and FAQs to assist the producers in complying with the rules. Without such guidelines, the producers may find it challenging to comply with the rules, which could lead to delays and confusion.

While the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, are essential in regulating the import and disposal of electronic waste in India, the short notice to the producers has caused confusion and stress. The government has failed to provide the online system on time, leaving producers with no option to comply with the regulations. This has put a burden on the producers who are already dealing with challenges related to supply chain disruptions and rising costs.

It is essential for the government to provide a reasonable timeline for the implementation of new regulations and ensure that the necessary infrastructure is in place before imposing new requirements on the industry. This will help to avoid disruptions in the supply chain and ensure that businesses can comply with regulations in a timely and efficient manner.

Moreover, the lack of clarity on the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, has caused confusion among producers, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) who may not have the resources to navigate the complex requirements. SMEs may struggle to comply with the regulations due to their limited resources, and this could lead to non-compliance and penalties, further affecting their business operations.

Additionally, the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, require producers to collect and recycle a specific percentage of electronic waste generated by their products. However, there is no clarity on how this will be implemented or how the cost of recycling will be shared among producers. This could lead to higher costs for producers, which may ultimately be passed on to consumers.

Furthermore, the lack of infrastructure to manage electronic waste in India is a significant challenge, and the government needs to invest in developing a robust e-waste management system. This would require significant investment in waste collection, recycling, and disposal infrastructure, as well as building awareness and education programs to encourage individuals and businesses to recycle their electronic waste responsibly.

In conclusion, while the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022, are a step in the right direction to address the growing problem of electronic waste in India, the government needs to ensure that the regulations are implemented in a way that does not cause undue hardship to producers. The government must provide adequate support and infrastructure to help producers comply with the rules and this must be done in a way that does not negatively impact their business operations. Only then can we ensure that electronic waste is managed responsibly and sustain ably, protecting both the environment and human health.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.