News Update

Mahashtra election: Cash of Rs 86 lakh recovered from car in MumbaiCBDT clarifies on CoD for returns claiming deduction u/s 80P for AY 2023-24 + specifies Forms for rollback of APA & applications u/s 35CCCCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold and silverUK Budget to mop up 40 bn pound from tax hikes for wealthy BritonsVietnamese, Philippine exports to America surge for second consecutive quarter as global supply chain shiftsUN calls for probe of killings in Bangladesh protestsChina’s factory output & services perk up in Oct monthChina initiates probe against AstraZenca chief in ChinaN Korean troops to return in body bags if they enter Ukraine: USUS economy grows by 2.8% in Q3National Internet Exchange of India unveils new office at World Trade Centre, New DelhiCus - CBIC appoints adjudicators for 60 casesIndian Railways signs MoU with Switzerland's DETEC to enhance Technological CollaborationGST - Working of Rule 96(10) has resulted in hostile discrimination amongst exporters who opt to apply for a refund u/s 16(3)(a) of IGST Act r/w Rule 89 of the CGST Rules and those who opt to apply for a refund in the manner contemplated by s.16(3)(b) - Rule 96(10) is manifestly arbitrary, hence ultra vires: HC51 killed in devastating flooding in SpainGST - Circular 231 prevails over the impugned order - ITC benefit available on demo vehicles: HCIndia-China border disengagement enters into last stretchGST - Secondment of employees - IGST demand - SCNs are rendered impotent in view of Board Circular 210/4/2024 - When value of services is accepted as Nil, no further tax implication would arise: HCUN says West Asia is at ‘most dangerous juncture’ amid rising Israel-Iran mercuryGST - It is not for this Court to be boggled by or question the wisdom of the CBIC as the Circular in any case binds the respondents: HCGST - Establishing that Appeal memo was signed by authorised signatory - Bench does not approve of the appellate authorities adopting shortcuts and dismissing the appeals: HCGST - Plea of the petitioner having an alternative remedy cannot be accepted as violation of principles of natural justice is an exception to the said plea: HCCX - Cash refund is not permissible where an assessee is unable to utilize credit on Inputs upon closure of unit - CESTAT orders are not error-prone: HCWheeling and Dealing: The Taxing Tale of Demo VehiclesCus - CBIC releases revised list of high-end refurbished medical equipmentCX - Govt notifies concessional excise duty for operators under UDANMudra Yojana: Loan Limit raised to Rs 20 Lakh from Rs 10 LakhGST & Customs relief to reduce MRP of 3 Anti-cancer Drugs: GovtI-T - Purchase of rights shares which does not contribute to income of assessee, can't be taxed: HCESIC network up from 393 Districts to 674 Districts now: Union Minister
 
Issuance of Notice and passing of orders - Extension of time - An un-necessary hue and cry?

JANUARY 02, 2024


By G Natarajan, Advocate, G N Law Associates

VIDE Notification 9/2023-Central Tax Dt. 31.03.2023 and vide Notification 56/2023-Central Tax Dt. 28.12.2023, the time limits for issue of show cause notices and for passing of adjudication orders, under Section 73 of the CGST Act have been extended, which has triggered a big hue and cry among the professional community. On social media, that is!

Let us have deep look into the subject.

Section 73 of the CGST Act deals with determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized for any reason other than fraud or any willful misstatement or suppression of facts.

As per sub-section (1) of Section 73 a notice has to be issued by the proper officer on the person who is liable to pay such tax, directing him to show cause as to why he should not be called upon to pay the amount (show cause notice). As per sub-section (2) such notice has to be issued at least three months prior to the time limit specified in sub-section (10) for issuance of order. Sub-section (10) lays down that the order for determination of the tax liability has to be issued within 3 years from the due date for furnishing annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid or short paid or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized relates to. Hence, unlike Central Excise law or Service Tax law, where the time limit was prescribed only for issuance of show cause notice and not for passing order, GST law prescribes the time limit within which adjudication orders have to be passed and the show cause notice in this regard has to be issued at least three months prior to the last date for issuance of order (giving at least three months to the taxpayer to file their reply).

It may be noted that the time limit for passing adjudication order has to be calculated with reference to the due date for filing annual return under Section 44 of the relevant year. As per Section 44 of the Act, the annual return for every financial year shall be filed on or before 31st December following the end of such financial year. As such, the annual return for the year 2017-18 (From July 2017) has to be filed on or before 31.12.2018. Thus, any adjudication order under Section 73 for the year 2017-18 should be passed on or before 31.12.2021 and the show cause notice has to be issued on or before 30.09.2021.

The time limit for filing annual return for the year 2017-18 was extended vide Notification 6/2020-Central Tax Dt. 03.02.2020 as 5th February 2020 for certain States and 7th February of 2020 for certain States. As a consequence, the time limit for issuing adjudication order and issuing show cause notice for the year 2017-18 under section 73 also stood extended to 5th / 7th February 2023 and 5th / 7th November 2022, respectively.

Vide Finance Act, 2021 a new Section 44 was enacted, which came into force from 01.08.2021. As per this new section, the due date for filing the annual return would be prescribed through rules. Simultaneously, a new Rule 80 was introduced in CGST Rules, 2017, vide Notification 30/2021-Central Tax Dt. 30.07.2021, with effect from 01.08.2021, wherein the due date has been prescribed as 31st December, following the end of the financial year. (The due date for filing annual return, which was prescribed in Section 44 of the Act itself, came to be prescribed in the Rules, from this date).

From March 2020, the normal life of the whole world was affected because of the corona pandemic and various proactive measures have been taken by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the Government to ease various compliance burdens, by relaxing the statutory time lines prescribed in various statutes. The Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and amendment of certain provisions) Act, 2020 was passed in this regard and vide Section 7 of the said Act, a new Section 168A was introduced in CGST Act, which came into force from 31.03.2020 and the said section is reproduced below -

168A. (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Government may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, extend the time limit specified in, or prescribed or notified under, this Act in respect of actions which cannot be completed of complied with due to force majeure.

(2) The power to issue notification under sub-section (1) shall include the power to give retrospective effect to such notification from a date not earlier than the date of commencement of this Act.

Explanation.- For the purposes of this section, the expression "force majeure" means a case of war, epidemic, flood, drought, fire, cyclone, earthquake or any other calamity caused by nature or otherwise affecting the implementation of any of the provisions of this Act.

It may be observed that this section empowers the Government to extend any time limits under the GST law, on account of any "force majeure" event.

In exercise of this power, Notification 13/2022-Central Tax Dt. 05.07.2022 has been issued whereby the time limit prescribed under sub-section (10) of Section 73, for issuance of adjudication orders for 2017-18 has been extended upto 30.09.2023. As a consequence, the time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 73 also stood extended upto 30.06.2023.

Once again, in exercise of the same power, Notification 9/2023-Central Tax Dt. 31.03.2023 has been issued whereby the time limit prescribed under sub-section (10) of Section 73, for issuance of adjudication orders for 2017-18 has been extended upto 31.12.2023. As a consequence, the time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 73 also stood extended upto 30.09.2023.

Recently, in exercise of the same power, Notification 56/2023-Central Tax Dt. 28.12.2023 has been issued whereby the time limit prescribed under sub-section (10) of Section 73, for issuance of adjudication orders for 2018-19 has been extended upto 30.04.2024. As a consequence, the time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 73 for the year 2018-19 also stands extended upto 31.01.2024. Further, the time limit prescribed under sub-section (10) of Section 73, for issuance of adjudication orders for 2019-20 has also been extended upto 31.08.2024. As a consequence, the time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 73 for the year 2019-20 also stands extended upto 31.05.2024.

Such successive extension of time for issuance of show cause notice and issuance of adjudication orders is widely being criticized. No doubt, certainty is a hallmark of taxation and especially in indirect taxation, indiscriminate extension of time for raising demands creates lot of uncertainty.

But let us delve deep into the issue.

It may be recalled as and when any due date for filing any returns approaches, there will be a big hue and cry from the professional community seeking extension of time for filing the returns. Even writ petitions would regularly be filed in various High Courts, seeking a mandamus to Government to extend the due date. And when the extension comes in the last hour, there would be joy and jubilation. All of us have forgotten the side effects of such extension that the time limit available for the department to raise the demand also gets extended automatically. So, we ourselves have to be blamed in this regard.

Coming to the extensions granted in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 168A, it may be noted that the normal life was affected due to corona pandemic not only for taxpayers but also for the department and many departmental officers also lost their lives during the pandemic. So, we cannot have a different scale when it comes to extensions granted for the Government.

It may be recalled that the pre pandemic due date for filing annual return for 2017-18 was 5th / 7th February 2020 and hence the due dates for passing adjudication orders and issue of show cause notice stood at 5th / 7th February 2023 and 5th / 7th November 2022 respectively.

It may be noted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in its suo moto order passed on 10.01.2022 [2022-TIOL-04-SC-MISC-LB] has considered that the period from 15th March 2020 to 28th February 2022 as the period affected by corona pandemic. While computing the time limit for filing any refund claims, as per Notification 13/2022-Central Tax Dt. 05.07.2022, the period from 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2022 should be excluded. Hence, the period from 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2022 can be considered as a "difficult period" for all concerned.

Hence, in all fairness, the period between 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2022, shall be excluded while computing the time limit available for department to issue orders and notices.

It may be noted that the starting point of the time available to the department under Section 73 (10) is the due date for filing annual return, i.e. 5th / 7th February 2020 for 2017-18 and the department hardly had 23 / 21 days prior to the onset of the difficult period (upto 28.02.2020). If we exclude the period from 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2022 (the clock should stop on 01.03.2020 and start running only from 01.03.2022), the remaining period (three years minus 23 / 21 days) available to the department would be upto 05.02.2025 / 07.02.2025 (for passing orders) and 05.11.2024 / 07.11.2024 (for issuance of show cause notice) As against the same, extension have been granted through various notifications, only upto 31.12.2023 and 30.09.2023, for issuance of orders and issuance of show cause notice respectively, for 2017-18.

So, though it appears that the extension of time granted to the department is harsh on the taxpayers, legally, it may not be so.

The argument that since the time limit prescribed under Section 73 is linked to due date for filing annual return, without extending the due date for filing annual return, the time limits under section 73 cannot be extended, must fail in view of the extra-ordinary powers available under Section 168 A.

Rather, our focus of argument should be as to why a period of three years should be prescribed for passing orders, from the due date for filing annual returns (which itself is 9 months after the end of the financial year) in cases not involving fraud, etc., while it was only two years under Central Excise and 30 months under Service Tax.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Extension of date

Dear sir,
The issue is not abt propriety of extension granted but the legality of issuing notification and the legal authority exercised foe issuing the same.

Rkshukla

Posted by rajkumar shukla
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Conferment of TIOL Awards 2024. The event was held on October 1, 2024 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy