News Update

We are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesMake the amnesty equitableNon-bailable warrants keep piling up against Vijay Mallya; Latest comes in Rs 180 Cr loan default caseCBIC hikes Central Excise duty on crude to Rs 6000 per tonne w.e.f July 2Unpacking Legal Circulars: The Scoop on Warranty and GST ImplicationsAustralia hikes visa fees to USD 1600 for foreign studentsProposed Sec. 128A of GST Act - some ruminationsGovt notifies CBI Court in Kolkata u/s 43 of PMLACus - Uploading assessment order on portal is not sufficient compliance of intimation: HC‘Dangerous precedent’, says Biden on latest SC ruling on immunity to PresidentCus - If any refund arises out of any order passed by the Commissioner(A)/Tribunal, unless a stay order is obtained, refund must be granted after three months from the date of the order: HCNorth Korea claims its ballistic missile now capable of ferrying super-large warheadsST - Petitioner was subjected to pay tax for the services availed for generation of power - Since Notification 15/2017-ST has been struck down, respondent to refund tax already paid: HCUS Supreme Court grants part relief to Donald Trump in poll subversion caseST - Non-imposition of Penalty - Once it is a discretion to be exercised, there can be no substantial questions of law arising thereof: HCUS Economy to grow at 2.6% in 2024: OECDGST - Transitional Credit - Recording invoices in the books of account, extension of time allowed u/s 140(5) proviso - However, it does not provide date by which such application is to be filed: HCBIS developing hub to connect UPI with four ASEAN countriesGST - Exports - Refund of IGST - Broken rings and chains supplied for making jewellery - Value of gold sold by jeweller would be shown inclusive of what is received - Respondent has excluded such value while working out refund - Matter remanded: HCTsunami of e-Way bills indicates strong economic growth momentum: GovtGST - GSTAT was not constituted when petition was filed - Since constituted now, petitioner directed to exhaust alternate remedy by filing appeal before it: HCC-DAC partners with MosChip & Socionext for design of High Performance Computing ProcessorGoyal interacts with industry leaders at HyderabadIndia to be lead chair of Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence
Untitled Document

THE PRODUCE CESS LAWS (ABOLITION) ACT, 2006

[No. 46 of 2006]

Dated : September 25, 2006

An Act to repeal the Agricultural Produce Cess Act, 1940 and the Produce Cess Act, 1966

BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows : -

1. Short title. - This Act may be called the Produce Cess Laws (Abolition) Act, 2006.

2. Repeal of Act 27 of 1940. - The Agricultural Produce Cess Act, 1940 is hereby repealed.

3. Repeal of Act 15 of 1966. - The Produce Cess Act, 1966 is hereby repealed.

4. Savings. - (1) The repeal by this Act of any enactment shall not, -

(a) affect any other enactment in which the repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to;

(b) affect the validity, invalidity, effect or consequences of anything already done or suffered, or any right, titled, obligation or liability already acquired, accrued or incurred or any remedy or proceeding in respect thereof, or any release or discharge of or from ay debt, penalty, obligation, liability, claim or demand, of any indemnity already granted, or the proof of any past act or thing;

(c) affect any principle or rule of law, or established jurisdiction, form or course of pleading, practice or procedure, or existing usage, customs, privilege, restriction, exemption, office or appointment, notwithstanding that the same respectively may have been in any manner affirmed or recognised or derived by, in or from any enactment hereby repealed;

(d) revive or restore any jurisdiction, office, custom, liability, right, title privilege, restriction, exemption, usage practice, procedure or other matter or thing not now existing or in force.

(2) The mention of particular matters in sub-section (1) shall not be held to prejudice or affect the general application of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897), with regard to the effect of repeals.

5. Collection and payment of arrears of duties. - Notwithstanding the repeal of the enactments specified in section 2 and section 3, the proceeds of duties levied under the said enactments immediately preceding the date on which the Produce Cess Laws (Abolition) Bill, 2006 (25 of 2006) receives the assent of the President, -

(i) If collected by the collecting agencies but not paid into the Reserve Bank of India; and

(ii) if not collected by the collecting agencies,

shall be paid or as the case may be, collected and paid into the Reserve Bank of India for being credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.