| TOP NEWS
IGST Refund to exporters - CBEC directs officers to do it through existing refund route
IGST Refund - Exporters advised to validate bank accounts in PFMS
CASE LAW
2017-TIOL-20-HC-AHM-GST
Filco Trade Centre Pvt Ltd Vs UoI
GST – Petitioners are dealers and importers of manufactured goods – They have challenged condition contained in section 140(3)(iv) of the CGST Act, 2017 – It is the case of the petitioners that they have sizeable stock of goods purchased prior to twelve months preceeding the said appointed date of 1 st July 2017, however, with the introduction of GST, the petitioners can avail CENVAT credit only in respect of stock of goods lying with them, on which the purchases were made not earlier than one year – inasmuch as by virtue of the said condition contained in section 140(3)(iv) of the CGST Act, 2017, no CENVAT credit is admissible to them. Held: Notice issued returnable on 17.11.2017 – notice issued to Attorney General also as legislation framed by the Parliament is under challenge: High Court [para 2, 3] - Notice issued: GUJARAT HIGH COURT
GUJARAT (RATES) NOTIFICATION
30/2017
Sate Tax Rate_Supply of Transit cargo services to Nepal and Bhutan
(RULES) NOTIFICATION
36/2017
Gujarat GST Notification for 8 th amendment in GGST rules
ORDER
Order 004
Gujarat Officers Empowered to Collect Affidavit for Brand Name
MAHARASHTRA (RATES) NOTIFICATIONS
028/2017
027/2017
026/2017
025/2017
024/2017
Trade Circular 44
Trade Circular for GST refund to UN Agencies and Diplomatic Authorities
MEGHALAYA (RULES) NOTIFICATION 102/2017
101/2017
100/2017
99/2017
98/2017
97/2017
96/2017
CORRIGENDUM
CIRCULAR 10
Corrigendum_01
Corrigendum06
ARTICLE
Is a GTO also a GTA under GST and hence liable to tax (Taxongo.com) | 
