News Update

PM commissions 3 frontline naval assetsNDPS - Seizure of 20kg ganja - Ordinarily, no taxi driver, before allowing to board, asks for passenger details - No incriminating material seized from person - Contraband not hidden - Passengers fled from spot - No material to link taxi driver with contraband: SCGST - COVID-19 - Period between 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 stood excluded for limitation as per SC order - Issuance of notifications 13/2022-CT, 9/2023-CT, 56/2023-CT may be an exercise in abundant caution - Petitioners may avail statutory remedy of appeal: HCGST - 'Ratification' done after issuance of Notification No.56/2023-CT will not provide life to it - 'Ratification' cannot be a substitute of 'recommendation': HCGST - Solar Power Generating System would not answer the description of immoveable property - Supply of the Solar generating Power Station is a 'composite supply' and it would not amount to a 'works contract': HCGST - Survey in business premises - If excess stock is found, proceedings u/s 73 or 74 of the Act will come into play rather than u/s 130 of the Act r/w Rule 122 of the Rules, 2017: HCST - Once tax is not payable in law, there was no authority for the department to retain such an amount, therefore, s.11B provisions would not stand attracted: HCHow To ServeImpeached South Korean President Yoon finally arrestedI-T- Re-assessment order valid where assessee fails to explain nature & source of certain income disclosed in course of Search operations: HCUS SEC sues Musk over delays in disclosure of Twitter purchaseI-T - Entire purchases can't be disallowed if AO never doubted production & sales, merely because ITC availed on purchases made by assessee was not admissible and assessee had paid tax under VAT Act: HCBiden’s farewell shot: No import of Chinese vehiclesI-T - If AO had not made specific allegation that assessee had paid money through banking channel and received back cash against those payments, then matter shall be remanded to AO to consider afresh: HCUS House okays Bill banning transgender athletes from women’s sportsI-T - No tax can be levied on advance amount received by assessee for agreed sale proceeds, if no sale of land was actually executed during year under consideration: ITATMeta to lay off 5% of poor performersI-T - 'Shastras & scriputres' define only way of life of civilized society and they are definitely not religion specific for benefit of public at large, and hence no reason to deny exemption u/s 80G(5) to trust: ITATGaza ceasefire deal likely to be lockedI-T- When new flat is obtained on transfer of old flat, assessee's claim for deduction u/s 54 of the Act is justified: ITATGovt appoints Justice D K Upadhyaya as CJ of Delhi HC & Justice Alok Araddhe as CJ of Bombay HCCoal imports drop by 3.1% during April-October, 2024VAT - Assessment order passed on estimate basis is upheld where assessee does not maintain accurate records or books of accounts: HCPoK is nothing more than foreign territory to Pakistan: RMCus - Delays be dealt with liberally, especially when there is no deliberate attempt to delay filing of refund claims; rejecting refund claims on technical grounds of limitation, is not tenable: CESTATPM launches 'Mission Mausam', releases IMD Vision-2047 documentCX - Assessment order passed without granting personal hearing; assessee's difficulties in participating in adjudication due to COVID pandemic overlooked - case remanded: CESTATMNRE issues Guidelines for implementation of PM-Surya GharCX - Rejection of assessee's refund claims without issuing a Show cause notice or giving valid reasons for rejecting claims, contravenes principles of natural justice: CESTAT
 
Dear FM, GST-boat is not fully rocked; A few quick steps may bring it back on rail!

TIOL - COB(WEB) - 199
AUGUST 05, 2010

By Shailendra Kumar, Editor

IN a significant development, the State Finance Ministers who are members of the Empowered Committee on GST, have yesterday summarily rejected the Draft Constitutional Amendment Bill sponsored by the Union Government. For most TIOL Netizens it may be a shocking and unexpected development but for many of us in TIOL Editorial it would have been more shocking if the Empowered Committee would have approved it in its present format. The proposed amendment bill which intends to vest the Union Finance Minister with the veto power as the head of the proposed GST Council, contains the embryo of lopsided dynamics of powers. In their zeal to please the Union Finance Minister the North Block honchos had failed to see the writing on the wall - unwilling States being cajoled by the FM to come to the negotiation table. It was well known that as soon as the States get even a small reason to protest against the proposed reforms, they would not miss the opportunity. In this backdrop, there was no chance that they would miss the wood for the tree!

Given the fact that the 'doctrine of consensus' has been the key driving force for the proposed indirect tax reforms, the North Block and the Law Ministry should have avoided showing the red rags to the 'bulls'! Any provision which lends dominant powers and responsibility for one of the negotiating partners in the proposed multi-lateral framework, was expected to evoke strong protest. And this is what has happened. Instead of a veto provision by the Centre, the ideal configuration would be the 'decision-by-consensus' even within the proposed GST Council. There is substance in the suggestion of the Kerala FM when he talked about having a Vice-Chairman post reserved for the States. Even the idea of rotating the post of Chairman between the Centre and the States is not bad, and its feasibility needs to be perused carefully.

Everything is certainly not lost as yet. The Union Finance Minister's battery of top officials just need to sit down with the State representatives, may be for 72 hours at a stretch, and redraft all those provisions which may invite locking horns or shrill protests from the States. Once it is ready, the EC can quickly convene another conclave in the next 10 days, and once the Draft is approved, a Bill can be moved before the Monsoon Session of Parliament comes to an end. The next 20 days are exorbitantly critical for the GST if it is destined to come into force from April 1, 2011. If the EC and the Centre fail to make use of the present Session of the Parliament which would necessarily be referring the Amendment Bill to the Standing Committee, it would be too late to table it in the next session. If Mr Dasgupta is indeed serious about what he has been pursuing for the past several years, he should cooperate with the Centre and meet the historic deadline.

But going by his statement (The Draft in the present form would “infringe upon the financial autonomy” of states), it may be inferred that either Mr Dasgupta has developed cold feet or now wants to play his own set of politics by talking about the alleged infringement of financial autonomy of the States. When all the stake-holders have been negotiating the possible fusion of financial powers of each party, where is the question of any other independent financial autonomy for any of the parties. Even the Centre would be losing its autonomy to amend the Central Excise and service tax rates once the GST is put in place. Mr Dasgupta or others in the EC should be talking about the specific objections to certain provisions rather than alleging any clothed move by the Centre to grab their powers. The entire Draft Bill is not unpleasant. Only a few provisions call for fine-tuning or rewording which can be achieved if party politics is kept at arm's length.

Unfortunately, the shadow of politics appears to be overshadowing the proposed reforms. The Amit Shah episode particularly appears to be ill-timed if one goes by its pernicious effect on the GST negotiations. Gujarat and MP have come out openly against the Constitutional Amendment Bill and do not appear to be in a mood to embrace their tryst with the real GST next fiscal. Many other States supported by the BJP or others have also protested against. Worse, even two of the Congress-ruled States - Andhra Pradesh and Haryana - have frowned at the Draft Bill. The UPA Govt's coalition partner DMK has also joined hands with others to rock the GST boat. All these States need to rise above their territorial and party politics if the GST is destined to be a reality by the next fiscal.

Meanwhile, while addressing the Parliament yesterday and answering questions on the inflation, the Union Finance Minister elatedly talked about the proposed GST system. He said the precious metals, bullion and other similar commodities are proposed to be taxed at 1% under CGST so that the 1% list is common both for SGST and CGST. The Centre proposes to shift the remaining commodities which are in the exempted category under Central Excise to the lower rate of the CGST. The FM also talked about the proposed GST rates, exemption threshold of Rs 10 lakh for both the goods and the services and the threshold for compounding for small traders.

All such talks would be inspiring confidence and hope among the taxpayers provided Mr Pranab Mukherjee makes his moves swiftly and bring back all the detractors to the negotiation table and amend the contentious provisions to the liking of the consensus. Any reforms of this magnitude which is historic by character, calls for Himalayan patience and courage to retrieve even a dying situation to the liking of the future course of events. Let's hope the Union Finance Minister and Mr Dasgupta move quickly to bring the GST talks back on rail!

TIOL Tube Latest

Former Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, delivering his Award Acceptance Speech after receiving TIOL Fiscal Heritage Award 2022 on Nov 8 at Taj Palace, New Delhi



Technical Session I - Ease of Doing Business: GST on Digital Economy