News Update

Cus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Flood gates opened for encashment of CENVAT credit against a single export!

JANUARY 21, 2014

By Ch Divakar Rao, Superintendent of Central Excise

THE 'not so performing units' with huge accumulated credits are here for a 'CENVAT credit encashment bonanza' if the present Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is not amended retrospectively. The earlier Rule 5 was substituted of with 'present Rule. 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004' by Notification No. 18/2012-C.E.(N.T.), Dt.17.03.2012, w.e.f. 01.04.2012.

The Present status of Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 allows a manufacturer who clears a final product or an intermediate product for export without payment of duty under bond or letter of undertaking, or a service provider who provides an output service which is exported without payment of service tax, shall be allowed refund of CENVAT credit as determined by the following formula subject to procedure safeguards, conditions and limitations, as may be prescribed by the Notification in the Official gazette.

(Export turnover of goods + Export turnover of services)
           Refund Amount = --------------------------------------------------------------- * Net CENVAT Credit
                                    
                           Total Turnover

Notification No. 27/2012 CE (N.T.), Dt. 18.6.2012

The Board issued a Notification. 27/2012 CE (N.T.), Dt. 18.6.2012 under the Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The said Notification among other things prescribed 'Form A', (henceforth referred as 'Form A') which basically spells out as to how the amount of refund granted shall be determined. There is no condition in the said rule or the notification issued under the said rule restricting the refund amount either to 'duty deemed to have suffered on inputs used in the manufacture of exported goods' or to 'duty that should have otherwise been payable on exported goods'. While doing so the intentions of the CBEC may have been to benefit the 'not so intelligent assessee' to take the benefit of such duties.

RELATED
Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 need a re-look!
Duty Credit Scrips used to Pay Excise Duty on Domestic Procurement - Is Rule 6(3) of the CCR Applicable?

Relevant date for refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules for export of services - Confusion Still Looms Large - Commissioner (Appeals) Decides

Transfer of CENVAT by adopting excess valuation of inputs is illegal in law
Rule 14 of CCR, 2004 - Amendment needed
Constitutional validity of Notification 32/2006-CE(N.T) and Rule 12AA of CCR, 2004
Refund of Service Tax Paid under Rule 5 of CCRs, 2004, by Exporters of Output Services
Registration is not mandatory for claiming refund of CENVAT Credit

However, there appears to be a serious flaw in the rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and safeguards, conditions and limitations prescribed under the Notification No.27/2012 CE (N.T.), Dt. 18.6.2012 issued under the said rule.

For ready reference the Form A is reproduced below :

S No

Description

Amount in Rs

1

Total value of the goods cleared for export and exported during the quarter.

 

2

Export turnover of the services determined in terms of Clause D of sub-rule (1) of rule 5.

 

3

Total CENVAT Credit taken on inputs and input services during the quarter.

 

4

Amount reversed in terms of sub-rule (5C) of rule 3

 

5

Net CENVAT Credit = (3) – (4)

 

6

Total value of all goods cleared during the quarter including exempted goods, dutiable goods and goods for export.

 

7

Export turnover of services and value of all other services, provided during the said quarter.

 

8

All inputs removed as such under sub-rule (5) of rule 3, against an invoice during the quarter.

 

9

Total Turnover = (6) + (7) + (8)

 

10

Refund amount as per the formula = (1) * (5) /( 9), in respect of goods exported.

 

11

Refund amount as per the formula = (2) * (5) /( 9), in respect of services exported.

 

12

Balance of CENVAT Credit available on the last day of quarter.

 

13

Balance of CENVAT Credit available on the day of filing the refund claim.

 

14

Amount claimed as refund, [Amount shall be less than the minimum of (10), (12) and (13) in case of goods or the minimum of (11), (12) and (13) in case of services]

 

15

Amount debited from the CENVAT account [shall be equal to the Amount claimed as refund (14)]

 

Now to take the advantage of the formula in the Rule and conditions specified in the Notification 27/2012 CE (N.T.), Dt. 18.6.2012, let us say an intelligent assessee having 'non performing unit' with huge accumulated credits (say Rs.1.2 Crore) may obtain inputs worth of Rs.10 crores on which CE duty may have been Rs 1.2 Crore @12% on the last week of the IInd Quarter, i.e. September' 2013 and the duty of Rs.1.2 Crore is taken as CENVAT Credit. Now the assessee has a total CENVAT Credit of Rs.2.4 Crore in his account. Then the assessee exports goods, whose value is just Rs.1 lakh, in the last week of II nd Quarter itself, i.e. September 2013 under LUT/BOND as prescribed under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Then, he realizes his export proceeds (BRC) within a week. The assessee has not made any other clearances during that quarter and till 15 th October 2013. Accordingly, the duty credit lying in his credit is Rs.2.4 Crore as on the last day of the quarter as well as say on the date of filing of the refund claim, say October 15 as the assessee makes an application in Form A for refund of CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 debiting Rs.1.2 Crore from CENVAT Credit as required under the Notification.

Now let us see, the quantum of refund available as per the Form. A.

S No

Description

Amount in Rs

1

Total value of the goods cleared for export and exported during the quarter.

 1,00,000

2

Export turnover of the services determined in terms of Clause D of sub-rule (1) of rule 5.

  Nil

3

Total CENVAT Credit taken on inputs and input services during the quarter.

 1,20,00,000

4

Amount reversed in terms of sub-rule (5C) of rule 3

Nil

5

Net CENVAT Credit = (3) – (4)

 1,20,00,000

6

Total value of all goods cleared during the quarter including exempted goods, dutiable goods and goods for export.

 1,00,000

7

Export turnover of services and value of all other services, provided during the said quarter.

 Nil

8

All inputs removed as such under sub-rule (5) of rule 3, against an invoice during the quarter.

 Nil

9

Total Turnover = (6) + (7) + (8)

 1,00,000

10

Refund amount as per the formula = (1) * (5) /( 9), in respect of goods exported.

 1,20,00,000

11

Refund amount as per the formula = (2) * (5) /( 9), in respect of services exported.

  Not Applicable

12

Balance of CENVAT Credit available on the last day of quarter.

 2,40,00,000

13

Balance of CENVAT Credit available on the day of filing the refund claim.

 2,40,00,000

14

Amount claimed as refund, [Amount shall be less than the minimum of (10), (12) and (13) in case of goods or the minimum of (11), (12) and (13) in case of services]

 1,20,00,000

15

Amount debited from the CENVAT account [shall be equal to the Amount claimed as refund (14)]

 1,20,00,000

From the above formula of Form A, the assessee becomes eligible for refund of CENVAT Credit of Rs.1.2 Crore on mere export of Rs.1 lakh, which is not certainly the intention of the Board. On submission of the application for refund of CENVAT Credit, the assessee utilizes the balance of accumulated CENVAT Credit of Rs.1.2 Crore for 'making clearances as such' of Rs.10 Crore material on which the CENVAT Credit has already been encashed. By above method, the assessee is able to wipe out total accumulated credit of Rs.1.2 Crore at one stroke. Similarly, other assessees following the same method will be able to encash the total CENVAT Credit even before making any other exports/domestic clearances,except for the single export for the purpose of encashment. The very purpose of restricting the CENVAT credit for payment of duty will be defeated. Unscrupulous and fly by night manufacturers may also take advantage of such refund of CENVAT Credit under Rule5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules,2004 leaving the Department high and dry.

Such flaw in Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules,2004 and the notification issued thereunder may be corrected retrospectively pegging the refund amount either to 'duty deemed to have suffered on inputs used in the manufacture of exported goods' or to 'duty that should have otherwise been payable on exported goods', if the same is not the intention of the Board. If not, then the assessees may rejoice and accordingly 'enjoy the CENVAT encashment bonanza'.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site. )

 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.