News Update

Wrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaGST - Conclusion that taxable person is providing a service to supplier while taking the benefit of a discount by facilitating an increase in the volume of sales of such supplier is ex facie erroneous and contrary to the fundamental tenets of GST law: HCIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US officialI-T- As per Section 119(2)(b), power to condone applications relate to claims for amount exceeding Rs 50 lakhs are to be considered by CBDT; however it is impermissible for CBDT to pass order on merits: HC8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 for unexplained income & u/s 69 for unexplained expenditure not tenable where complete transactional details are furnished & not doubted: HCRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthI-T- Delay in filing ITR is per se insufficient reason to estimate assessee's profit @15% on turnover, more so where audited financial report is filed in timely manner: ITATMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- For invoking section 69A, assessee should be found to be owner of any money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article & which is not recorded in the books of account: ITATGovt proposes Guidelines for ethical approach to Coal MiningI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024I-T- Lending money with the primary intention of earning interest can be considered a business activity, but nature and manner of lending, as well as the frequency, should be taken into account: ITAT
 
Nepal Restrictions still Linger - Intentional? Will CBEC clarify?

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2539
16 02 2015
Monday

THE Government had vide notifications 24-29/CE(NT) dated 05.12.2011 amended six CE NT Notifications to delete the special procedure for export of goods to Nepal. Those notifications prescribed the procedure, conditions etc. for exports to countries other than Nepal and Bhutan.

Resultantly, export to Nepal was made just like export to any other country. These amending notifications were effective from 01.03.2012.

Incidentally, they forgot to amend Notification No. 21/2004-CE(NT), which they amended by notification 02/2012-CE(NT) dated 22.02.2012.

While reporting the December 2011 notifications we had in DDT 1750 mentioned Export to Nepal - Liberalisation - What about Service Tax?.

CBEC did not react.

We again made a mention while reporting the notification 02/2012-CE(NT).

DDT 1802 said -

But what about Service Tax? In DDT-1750 12.12.2011, it was pointed out,

Notification No. 11/2005-Service Tax, dated 19.04.2005 grants rebate of Service Tax on taxable services exported to countries other than Nepal and Bhutan.

Similarly, Notification No. 12/2005-Service Tax, dated 19.04.2005 grants rebate of the duty paid on excisable inputs or service tax and cess paid on taxable input services used in providing taxable service exported to countries other than Nepal and Bhutan,

Why Nepal is retained in these two notifications? Has the Board forgotten these notifications or is it intentional?

That was in February, 2012. Three years have gone by and nothing has been done. Perhaps the "retention" of "Nepal" in these notifications is "intentional". But what is the intention?

Yesterday, we received a mail from a netizen asking us why DDT is silent all these years on the issue. Unfortunately, we can only point out the dirt - we can't clean it.

The Netizen also pointed out another notification which craves for similar attention.

It is the SSI Notification 8/2003-CE -

Paragraph 5, Explanation clause "G" reads -

G) "clearances for home consumption", wherever referred to in this notification, shall include clearances for export to Bhutan and Nepal;

The Netizen quips -

"When export to Nepal is at par with export to other countries, then if the export clearances made to Nepal is to be included in the clearances for home consumption, it will be a disadvantageous position for assessees clearing their goods for export to Nepal. In my view notification 8/2003 ought to have been amended accordingly."

DDT hopes that this time around, before the Budget Notifications are issued, the CBEC will rectify this anomaly.

Or clarify that the discrimination is intentional. The Prime Minister wants a special relationship with Nepal - will CBEC jeopardise that?

Please also see No rebate to Exporters of Services to Nepal . . . But why !!!

FTP - Online IEC Applications - Fee reduced

DGFT has notified that the application fee for online IEC, notified vide Public Notice. 79/(RE-2013)/2009-2014 dated the 31st December, 2014 should be read as Rs 250/- instead of Rs 500/-. The new system has come into force with effect from 1.2.2015.

DGFT Public Notice No.85 (RE-2013)/2009-2014, Dated: February 13, 2015.

Anti Dumping Duty on Graphite Electrodes

GOVERNMENT has imposed definitive anti dumping duty on graphite electrodes of all diameters falling under heading 8545 originating in, or exported from the People's Republic of China.

See how difficult it is to impose an anti dumping duty - in this case, the investigation started sometime in 2013. The Designated Authority published his final findings on 19th November 2014. The Revenue Department issued the notification on 13th February 2015 - and obviously all these days, dumping has been going on merrily.

Notification No. 04/2015-Customs (ADD), Dated: February 13, 2015.

Tariff Value of Gold, Silver Decreased

THE  Government has decreased the Tariff value of Gold from 412 USD to 397 USD per 10 gms. The tariff value of Silver is also decreased from 568 USD to 551 USD per kilogram.

Tariff values of all other items except Poppy seeds have seen changes.

The Tariff values as on 30.01.2015  and with effect from 13.02.2015   are as under:

Table 1

S. No.

Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item

Description of goods

Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne)    
from 30.01.2015

Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tonne)    
from 13.02.2015

(1)

(2)

(3)

(5)

(6)

1

1511 10 00

Crude Palm Oil

681

669

2

1511 90 10

RBD Palm Oil

707

710

3

1511 90 90

Others - Palm Oil

694

690

4

1511 10 00

Crude Palmolein

724

719

5

1511 90 20

RBD Palmolein

727

722

6

1511 90 90

Others -Palmolein

726

721

7

1507 10 00

Crude Soyabean Oil

864

792

8

7404 00 22

Brass Scrap (all grades)

3537

3484

9

1207 91 00

Poppy seeds

3747

3747

Table 2

S. No.

Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item

Description of goods

Tariff value USD    
from 30.01.2015

Tariff value USD    
from 13.02.2015

1

71 or 98

Gold, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 321 and 323 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed.

412 per 10 grams

397 per 10 grams

2

71 or 98

Silver, in any form in respect of which the benefit of entries at serial number 322 and 324 of the Notification No. 12/2012-Customs dated 17.03.2012 is availed.

568 per kilogram

551 per kilogram

Table 3

S. No.

Chapter/ heading/ sub-heading/tariff item

Description of goods

Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons)    
from 30.01.2015

Tariff value USD (Per Metric Tons)    
from 15.02.2015

1
080280
Areca nuts
2183  
2280

Direct Tax Collections up by 11 per cent

A CBDT Press Release says that Gross direct tax collection during April-January of the Financial Year 2014-15 is up by 11.38 percent at Rs. 5,78,715 crore as against Rs. 5,19,588 crore collected during the same period last year.

The Finance Minister hoped to collect Rs. 7.36 crores as direct taxes in this fiscal. They have got him 5.79 crores - they still have to collect 1.57 crores. As per the target, they should have collected Rs. 6.15 crores by end of January. Their shortfall is only 34,000 crores. So they may give the FM the money he wants.

Commissioners not co-operating with Sleuths

THE Investigation Directorates in both the Revenue Boards are grossly understaffed and in any case they don't have the manpower to conduct large raids and searches and they have to depend on the local jurisdictional Commissioners for supply of manpower.

It has been brought to the notice of the CBDT that some of the Commissioners are not providing manpower to the Investigation Directorates for the purposes of conducting searches for one reason or the other.

Board now directs that the manpower requisitioned by the Investigation Directorates should normally not be refused except in extra-ordinary circumstances.

CBDT FNo.286/15/2015-IT(INV.II), Dated: February 12, 2015.

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.