News Update

WIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
Treading the GST Path - V - Transitional Credit

SEPTEMBER 07, 2016

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associates

1.0 THE following situations for transitional credit are provided for in the Model GST law.

2.0 As per Section 16 (2) of the model Act, any person who is liable to be registered under the Act is entitled for input tax credit in respect of stock of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi finished goods or finished goods, on the day immediately preceding the date of rom which he becomes liable to pay tax under this Act. It may be noted that this provision refer to "input tax" and hence it refers to CGST/SGST/IGST paid on the stock of inputs. For example, if a person is below the threshold limit under the model Act and when he becomes liable for registration, he is entitled for input tax credit of the above duties paid in respect of inputs in stock in various forms.

2.1 As per Section 16 (2A) of the model Act, though a person is not liable to be registered, but if he opts to obtain registration under Section 19 (3), he should also be entitled to similar input tax credit as above.

2.2 As per Section 16 (3) of the Act, any person who ceases to pay GST under the composition scheme as per Section 8 of the Act and hence switches over to normal method of taxation would also be eligible to take input tax credit in respect of the inputs held stock and contained in semi finished goods or finished goods.

2.3 In all the above three situations, the quantum of credit should be computed on the basis of generally accepted accounting principles (generally on FIFO basis or any other recognised method). The credit claimed in the above three situations should be supported by a valid invoice and such invoice should not be more than one year old on the date of taking credit. Further, it may also be noted that all the above situations under Section 16 deal with availment of input tax credit of CGST/SGST/IGST paid on inputs, in the given situations.

3.0 As per section 143 of the model Act, the credit balance in the Cenvat Credit Account and Input Tax Credit account, as per the last return filed under the earlier law, would be carried forward as CGST credit and SGST credit respectively in the first return under GST law, subject to a condition that such credit is admissible both under earlier law and GST law.

4.0 As per Section 144 of the model Act, the unavailed credit on capital goods, can be availed under GST law. For example, as per the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the capital goods received in a year, credit could be taken only to an extent of 50 %. The balance 50 % credit, if not availed under the earlier law, could be availed under GST law.

5.0 Section 145 of the model Act provides for transitional credit in certain situations. A person who was not liable to pay any tax under the earlier law (either the products dealt with by him are exempted or for any other reason) and who becomes liable to be registered under the GST law, shall be entitled to avail credit of eligible duties paid in respect of inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi finished gods or finished goods on the date of introduction of GST. The credit claimed in the above situation should be supported by a valid invoice and such invoice should not be more than one year old on the date of taking credit.

6.0 As per section 146 of the model Act if a person was paying duties / tax under any composition scheme under the earlier law (where credit is not permissible), but who is liable to pay tax under GST law under normal scheme (not composition scheme under Section 8) is eligible to take input tax credit of the eligible duties paid on inputs held in stock and contained in semi finished goods or finished goods held in stock. The credit as above should be supported by a valid invoice and such invoice should not be more than one year old on the date of taking credit.

6.1 For example a service provider executing works contracts and paying service tax as per Rule 2 A of the Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 is not entitled for availing cenvat credit of the duties paid on inputs. Under the GST law, appropriate CGST/SGST/IGST would be payable on the works contracts executed by him and the differentiation between levy of service tax on services and levy of VAT / CST on the transfer of property in goods would vanish. Once such service provider becomes liable to pay CGST/SGST/IGST on the works contract executed by him, he should be allowed input tax credit of the duties paid on inputs in stock, which has been provided for under this section.

7.0 It may be noted that the situations dealt with in para 3.0 to 6.1 above deals with availment of input tax credit of "earlier duties" paid on inputs.

8.0 A careful reading of the above provisions would suggest that the following situations have not been contemplated under GST law.

8.1 If a person is not liable to pay any tax under the earlier law, due to product being exempted or he being within the threshold limit etc. Immediately on introduction of GST also, he is not liable to be registered (either due to product continue to be exempted under GST law; he still being within the threshold limit under GST law, etc.). But after sometime subsequent to introduction of GST, he may become liable to be registered under GST law. At that time, he might have having stock of old inputs in various forms, on which "earlier duties" are paid and new inputs in various forms, on which "GST" has been paid. There would be no problem in availing credit of the GST paid on such inputs, as per Section 16 (2). Credit of earlier duties paid on inputs is allowed under Section 145 is allowed, only when he becomes liable to pay GST, on the date of introduction of GST and does not cover a situation where such person is not liable to be registered under GST also, but becomes liable to be registered at a later date. In this situation there is no mechanism to avail credit of the earlier duties paid on inputs in stock.

8.2 The various provisions relating to availment of input tax credit of either earlier duties or GST in various situations, refer to duties paid on inputs held in stock and inputs contained in semi-finished or finished goods. The use of the word "or" above would create hurdles as the same can be interpreted that credit would be admissible either for the stock of semi-finished goods or for the stock of finished goods and not both. Though in the above situation "or" has to be read as "and", to avoid litigations on this issue, the word "or" may be replaced with "and".

8.3 There may be a situation where certain inputs have been despatched just prior to introduction of GST and received after introduction of GST. There is no mechanism available for availing input tax credit of earlier duties paid on such inputs, received after introduction of GST. Let us assume that GST is introduced from 01.04.2017. On 30.03.2017, certain goods have been despatched by the supplier, on payment of Excise duty or certain services have been billed with service tax. An assesse receives such goods / invoices after 01.04.2017. In such situation, there is no mechanism available to avail input tax credit of the Excise duty / Service Tax paid on inputs and input services, as CGST credit.

9.0 Further, it may also be noted that all the above provisions would be contained both under CGST law and SGST law.

Treading the GST Path-IV - Transitional Credit - Explained

Treading the GST Path-III - Certain snippets on ITC

Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed

Treading the GST Path-I - A 'Principal' mismatch?

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.