News Update

WIPO data shows Chinese inventors filing highest number of AI patentsManish Sisodia’s judicial custody further extendedCus - Export of non-basmati rice - Notification 20/2023 insofar as it denies the benefit of the transitional arrangement as contained in para-1.05 of the FTP 2023, is bad in law: HCCus - Refund of SAD - 102/2007-Cus - Areca Nut and Supari are one and the same - Objections with regard to name, nature and status of importer or buyers or the end use of goods purchased by them etc. are extraneous: HCCX - Interest on Refund - Since wrong order annexed by petitioner in paper book, Bench is unable to proceed further - Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh one: HCGST - No E-way bill - When petitioner imports machinery and after Customs clearance, transports same to his own factory, it cannot be said that such a transportation would fall within the definition of term 'supply' - Penalty imposable under second limb of s.129(1)(a): HCGST - Fix responsibility on officers who allowed BG to lapse - Petitioner not justified in not renewing BG - Cost of Rs.15 lacs imposed, to be paid to PM Cares Fund: HCGST - Since the parties agree that petition can be disposed of on the basis of records available before Appellate Authority, petitioner is directed to enclose all documents filed before Appellate Authority in a compilation, in form of a paper book: HCWrong RoadST - Whether any service is used for personal consumption or not is certainly question of fact and being question of fact, no substantial question of law arises: HCGovt proposes to amend Geographical Indication of Goods Rules; Draft issued for feedbackST - If what has been paid as tax is without authority of law, Revenue should refund the same - Denial of credit would result in the whole exercise being tax neutral: HCWarehousing Authority notifies several agri goods to be stored in only registered warehousesST - Even if the petitioner may have a case on merits, it is best left to be decided by the Appellate Authority under the hierarchy prescribed under the FA, 1994: HCUS FDA okays Eli Lilly Alzheimer’s drugGST - Petitioner challenges jurisdiction of assessing officer - Petitioner is entitled to file an appeal u/s 107 by availing an alternate efficacious remedy: HCFive from Telangana killed in car accident on Pune-Solapur HighwayGST - Existence of an alternative remedy is a material consideration but not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction: HCHush money case against Donald Trump - Sentencing deferred to Sept 18GST - It is open to a trader to take goods by whichever route he opts, unless the law otherwise requires, destination point being intact: HCDeadly hurricane Beryl smashes properties in JamaicaIsrael claims 900 militants killed in Rafah since May monthGST - Order expressly records that personal hearing notice was returned with endorsement 'no such person at address' - Since petitioner has shifted to a new premises, it is just and necessary to provide an opportunity to contest demand: HC116 die in stampede at UP ’Satsang’I-T- Application for revision of order dismissed in limine on grounds of delay; case remanded for re-consideration: HCWe are deepening economic ties with India, says US official8 Dutch engineers build world’s longest bicycle - 180 feet, 11 inchesRailways earns Rs 14798 Crore from Freight loading in June monthMoD inks MoU to set up testing facilities in Unmanned Aerial System in TN Defence Industrial CorridorI-T- TDS credit can be allowed based on AIS, where details pertaining to TDS, advance tax & other payments are reflected in Form 26AS: ITATVaishnaw to inaugurate Global IndiaAI Summit 2024
 
GST on Supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse – Part III

 

FEBRUARY 05, 2018

By G Mohana Rao, Assistant Commissioner (Retd.)

THE following two earlier articles penned by me on the above subject refers –

GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse - Part I

GST on supply of goods while same are in Customs Bonded Warehouse - Part II

There are numerous articles written on the subject by many others as well. It was felt that the issue could not be resolved simply by resorting to circulars. Now, the government has rightly proposed change in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 through the Finance Bill presented on 1 st February 2018. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is proposed to be amended by way of insertion of two sub-sections 8A and 10A so as to provide for value of goods when they are sold within the warehousing period for calculation of Integrated tax and Compensation Cess respectively. This is expected to pave way for the solution of the problem. The new subsection could provide for different values for payment of Integrated tax and Compensation Cess when the warehoused goods are sold. The proposed sub-section 8A to Section 3 is reproduced below:

'(8A) Where the goods deposited in a warehouse under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 are sold to any person before clearance for home consumption or export under the said Act, the value of such goods for the purpose of calculating the integrated tax under sub-section (7) shall be, -

(a) where the whole of the goods are sold, the value determined under sub-section (8) or the transaction value of such goods, whichever is higher; or

(b) where any part of the goods is sold, the proportionate value of such goods as determined under sub-section (8) or the transaction value of such goods, whichever is higher:

Provided that where the whole of the warehoused goods or any part thereof are sold more than once before such clearance for home consumption or export, the transaction value of the last such transaction shall be the transaction value for the purposes of clause (a) or clause (b):

Provided further that in respect of warehoused goods which remain unsold, the value or the proportionate value, as the case may be, of such goods shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (8).

Explanation. –– For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression "transaction value", in relation to warehoused goods, means the amount paid or payable as consideration for the sale of such goods.';

Sub-section 10A is basically a reproduction of sub-section 8A above inserted for the purpose of determining value for calculating Compensation Cess.

The Importer deposits goods in Customs Bonded warehouse in order to defer the duty only. Therefore, in such a case of warehoused goods being sold, the importer should not be asked to pay any duty at this point of time of warehousing. The time of supply for this supply should only be at the time when he clears the goods from Customs Bonded warehouse.

The importer, on clearing the goods from Customs Bonded warehouse will have to pay the requisite Customs duty, Integrated tax and compensation Cess. No GST need to be paid on the sale while the goods are in customs bonded warehouse. In this way, the government will not lose the revenue on the difference value received by the importer and the buyer will also not be paying double tax of IGST. The probabilities of ITC shopping by shifting ITC without economic value shifting to buyer also get diminished.

The circular No. 46/2017-Customs dated 24th November 2017 (amended on 6th December, 2017) will need to be suitably amended or rescinded.

I hope this step of solving the issue by way of amending the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is a step in the right direction and may set the issue to rest.

(The author is Managing Partner, Elysian Tax Advisors, Mumbai and the views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site)

 

TIOL Tube Latest

India's Path to Becoming a Superpower: An Interview with Pratap Singh



Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.