News Update

CII projects 7.7% growth in current fiscalDRI nabs two persons with about 6 kg ivoryIBBI Chief calls for preserving reputation of fledgling institutionService Matter - Relief to Ashok Aggarwal - Disciplinary authority cannot approve initiation of enquiry by ignoring statements of witnesses and merely relying on gist of evidence forwarded by CBI: HCCCI invites public comments on merger of Linde & Praxaire-Way Bill for Intra-State movement of goods - State tally goes up to 27PM inaugurates Delhi-Meerut ExpresswayTax benefits to angel investors - CBDT inserts Clause (Viib) in Sec 56India generates 940 tonnes of plastic waste every day: Dr Harsh VardhanAnti-dumping duty imposed on ‘Saturated Fatty Alcohols' imported from Indonesia, Malaysia and ThailandGovt stipulates 8.5% interest rate on PFRule 11UA - Word 'or an accountant' omitted + Clause (viib) of Section 56(2) not to apply to consideration received by a Company for issue of shares that exceeds face value of such shares if received from an investorI-T - Taxable event arises as soon as interest income on bank deposits accrues & becomes due; Deferred receipts on instruction of depositor will not make it hypothetical income: HCFM is out of ICU; recovering fast after kidney transplantAnti-dumping duty on on'Ammonium Nitrate' - Notification 44/2017-Cus(ADD) amended to substitute name of exporter at sr. no.1 as 'Euro Chem Trading GMBH Through Rawfert Offshore Sal, Lebanon'Finance Commission team to visit Kerala on coming MondayWTO Chief calls for reducing trade tensionsNIC cloud-based data centre to go live in OrissaCBIC clarifies on application of IGST on goods supplied while deposited in Customs bonded warehousePublic comments sought on Draft NDCP till June 1, 2018PM lays foundation stone for Patratu Super Power ProjectI-T - It is not open for AO to make additions while framing assessment u/s 143(3) merely on basis of seized documents beyond period of limitation u/s 153A: ITATIndia to rope in international labs for food testingISC Panel finalises recommendations of Punchhi CommissionCBIC introduces monetary limits of Rs.2.50 lakhs for filing Revenue appeals before Commissioner(A); applicable to CX & ST legacy cases and those currently pending.Govt sanctions out of turn coal to PSUs; Private plants find themselves at receiving endACC appoints JS, TRU, Alok Shukla as Minister (Customs) in PMI to WTO at GenevaACC grants one more year extension to CBDT Chairman Sushil ChandraThere is no provision in the CGSTAct which allows exemption on an Input Service if the Output service provided by taxable service is exempt: AARServices provided to M/s Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. – since it is company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, and not a State Government authority, benefit of concessional rate @12% not available: AARServices provided of diagnosis, pre and post counseling therapy qualify to be health care services and attract Nil rate of Tax: AARTransaction of transfer of one of the units of the applicant as a going concern amounts to supply of service – Nil rate under 12/2017-CT(R): AAR
 
Service tax on GTAs : Make it 2.5 per cent with no strings attached

By TIOL Edit Team

SERVICE Tax on Goods Transport Agency has come into effect from 1st Jan 2005, with a number of Notifications issued by the MoF on various issues. After one month of experience, it is worthwhile to review the difficulties faced by all those concerned with the policy decision. Given the fact that the Goods Transport Agents were up in arms against this levy on them, the Government followed the recommendations of the Bhardwaj Committee and shifted the liability of paying Tax from the GTAs to either consignors or consignees. This peculiar concept of making the recipient of the Service liable to pay tax has created serious problems for the taxpayers.

As per Rule 2(1)(d)(v) of the Service Tax Rules, the consignee or consignor falling under the categories specified therein is liable to pay the tax. But the amount of tax to be paid is governed by the Notification 32/2004 dated 3.12.2004. This Notification exempts 75% of the gross amount charged from service tax, subject to the condition that no credit shall be availed on the inputs/capital goods used under the provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for providing such taxable service. If the gross amount paid is Rs 100, the duty liability under this notification would be Rs 2.5 (10% on Rs 25). Thus, the effective tax liability would be at 2.5% on the gross amount charged (for the sake of brevity, education cess is ignored). This amount has to be assessed by the consignee or consignor and the condition of “not availing the credit” has to be fulfilled by the GTA! How can the consignor or consignee ensure that the GTA stationed at a far off place has taken credit or not? So the consignors/consignees who are willing to take registration and pay tax are in utter confusion as to whether they can avail the benefit of Notification 32/2004 or not and also how it is possible for them to ensure that the GTA has not availed any credit. And what is the machinery available to check this?

And, what would happen if the consignor /consignee pays 2.5% tax and the GTA takes credit without the knowledge of the consignee/consignor? Can the department ask them to pay 10% instead of 2.5% from the consignor/consignee for a violation by the GTA on which they have no control? Going by the past experience in input credit disputes, it is all likely that the consignor /consignee cannot be penalized for the violation on part of the GTA.

But, why there should be such condition in the Notification? Obviously no inputs are required for providing the Service of a GTA ( HSD and MS are excluded from the definition of inputs). The only item they can take credit is perhaps a one time excise duty paid on a Truck. But that would make not only their consignee/consignors not entitled for exemption under Notification 32/2004 , but also the GTA himself, in cases where the GTA is liable to pay service tax. Between the options of paying service tax at full rate by availing onetime credit on the Truck, and paying only 2.5% by not availing the credit, more and more GTA s would choose only the later option.

Instead of the above, it is better that the Government exclude the GTAs from the purview of Cenvat Credit and make the tax effective at 2.5% across the board and give wide publicity. A tax rate at 2.5% is not a very horrifying and perhaps this kind of presentation would make more and more assessees voluntarily contribute to the kitty and thus make this difficult task of taxing the truckers a smooth ride. Perhaps North Block needs to borrow a few marketing strategies from the corporate houses too!


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Service tax on GTAs Make it 2 5 per cent with no strings attached

Sir,


I am working in manufacturing industry and we are purchasing raw material through transport like AFL Logistics,Gatti Cargo and we are paying freight charges but the transporter himself collected the freight charges and with service tax.

We are registered with Service tax dept in GTA service.Dept asking to pay service tax for freight.But Transporter also charging service tax.

Kindly reply



Posted by ramesh ramesh